"For cheap 60 no rx years many have believed vaccines trigger MS relapses, and there zithromax prescription is much misinformation available online and on social media currently buy clozapine generic to support this false claim," she said. "While several studies buy cafergot without prescription have been conducted on the association between vaccination and MS cheapest generic viagra onset, evidence on the association of vaccination with disease activity atrovent prescription (flare-ups) and progression among patients with MS remain scarce." They sales no prescription also noted improved pain and sleep quality scores, but these order cialis results were not statistically significant. A person with MS should buy no online prescription speak with a doctor before starting any new exercise or generic asacol info alternative therapy program. TNFα is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, which means australia malaysia it plays a role in promoting inflammation in the body. zithromax prescription However, in conditions such as MS, there can be disruption discount cipro to the regulation of necroptosis, leading to the loss of specific.

When the FCC landed on Comcast for slowing Bittorrent traffic to a crawl–in essence, discouraging people from watching Internet movies, and steering them to their Comcast Cable TV channels instead–Comcast took the FCC to court. Comcast protested on three grounds, but the basic ground was that the FCC had no authority to tell Comcast to do anything with its Internet service. A panel of three judges has unanimously ruled that Comcast is correct (and therefore didn’t bother with Comcast’s arguments #2 and #3). Public Knowledge has a good explanation of the decision and where it leaves us.

I am disappointed, but I can’t say I am surprised. Congress did not anticipate the Internet when it made telephone regulations, just at it didn’t anticipate the telephone or the radio when it made telegraph regulations. So if there is going to be net neutrality, it appears Congress will have to act. That was on Obama’s campaign agenda, but regulation of anything is not an easy sell in Washington.

Yet it is clear that monopolies are a bad idea, and the business community, except for Verizon, Comcast, and a few other biggies, should support the free flow of bits over the Internet pipes. My previous post is remarkably relevant on this point. Listen to Gardiner Hubbard’s description from 125 years ago of the fate of one small business bullied by the Western Union monopoly:

A few years ago a man started a news bureau in Cincinnati. A correspondent in New-York filed the market reports each morning and the Cincinnati gentleman sold the information to customers. The Western Union asked him to sell out to them and he refused; thereupon his messages were taken away from the “through” wire and sent by a “way” wire. The difference in time was an hour, and the man was ruined. (New York Times, February 8, 1883)

As far as I can see, there is no reason why Comcast couldn’t do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 at 10:02 pm and is filed under The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.