When store get generic without nasonex prescription a person has symptoms of aspergillosis or experiences any other asacol bangkok respiratory symptoms, it is important for them to tell their cialis buy drug doctor if they think they have experienced exposure to mold. get viagra alternatives store — Dr. Paul Drury, cadiologist The researchers noted that stressful cialis free delivery life events, poor sleep, and feelings such as depression, anxiety, buy generic lasix or feeling overwhelmed are often interrelated. If you drink alcohol, buy generic mirapex talk with your doctor about how much (if any) is find robaxin online safe to consume while you're taking aripiprazole. Doctors use the discount ventolin term "ectopic pregnancy" to describe the implantation of a fertilized acomplia uk egg outside of the uterus — typically in one of fda approved viagra the fallopian tubes. Taking one serving from its container and eating.

When the FCC landed on Comcast for slowing Bittorrent traffic to a crawl–in essence, discouraging people from watching Internet movies, and steering them to their Comcast Cable TV channels instead–Comcast took the FCC to court. Comcast protested on three grounds, but the basic ground was that the FCC had no authority to tell Comcast to do anything with its Internet service. A panel of three judges has unanimously ruled that Comcast is correct (and therefore didn’t bother with Comcast’s arguments #2 and #3). Public Knowledge has a good explanation of the decision and where it leaves us.

I am disappointed, but I can’t say I am surprised. Congress did not anticipate the Internet when it made telephone regulations, just at it didn’t anticipate the telephone or the radio when it made telegraph regulations. So if there is going to be net neutrality, it appears Congress will have to act. That was on Obama’s campaign agenda, but regulation of anything is not an easy sell in Washington.

Yet it is clear that monopolies are a bad idea, and the business community, except for Verizon, Comcast, and a few other biggies, should support the free flow of bits over the Internet pipes. My previous post is remarkably relevant on this point. Listen to Gardiner Hubbard’s description from 125 years ago of the fate of one small business bullied by the Western Union monopoly:

A few years ago a man started a news bureau in Cincinnati. A correspondent in New-York filed the market reports each morning and the Cincinnati gentleman sold the information to customers. The Western Union asked him to sell out to them and he refused; thereupon his messages were taken away from the “through” wire and sent by a “way” wire. The difference in time was an hour, and the man was ruined. (New York Times, February 8, 1883)

As far as I can see, there is no reason why Comcast couldn’t do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 at 10:02 pm and is filed under The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.