When buy cheap cialis online a person completes their treatment, a doctor may still want buy prozac without prescription to closely monitor them, so it is important to attend purchase quinine online all follow-up appointments. If you and your doctor determine that cheap lipitor from canada Multaq is safe and effective for you, you'll likely take ampicillin without prescription it long term. IUDs do not protect against STIs, so get cheapest diclofenac low price canada people will need to use additional protection, such as condoms zyprexa overnight delivery or another barrier method, to reduce the risk of STIs. order retin-a Some people with bipolar disorder also experience psychosis, which can order 60 in canada involve symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and paranoia. There is estradiol valerate for order also evidence that TSI tests can help determine the outlook cialis cheap price for people with Graves' disease. Due to the high fat cheapest viagra online and sugar content, white chocolate is usually higher in calories buy viagra low cheap price than other chocolate varieties. Over time, they can affect a cheap zofran from usa person's reflexes, strength, and mobility, according to the National Institute viagra alternative of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. They start as raised scars that.

Lots of news items today on the privacy front.

The new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government in England has launched a remarkably aggressive campaign to unwind the ubiquitous surveillance that was put in place through the years of the Labour government. The deputy prime minister refers to a “culture of spying on its citizens” and says “It is outrageous that decent, law-abiding citizens get treated as if they have got something to hide.” In the U.S. the politics of surveillance seem to be the reverse of the attitudes in England. Here it is the left that complains about the violations of individual liberty occasioned by surveillance, either governmental or commercial, and it is the right that defends surveillance, either as an aid to law enforcement and national defense, or as a free exercise of unrestrained capitalism.

Here, thanks to Larry Denenberg, is a terrific CBS News segment on the privacy risks due to copy machines, which in the modern era are nothing more than scanners attached to computers — with hard drives. Those hard drives hold huge amounts of data, which doesn’t get deleted between jobs. Just as in the case we report in Blown to Bits about the data that can be recovered from the hard drives of used personal computers, a LOT can be recovered from the disk drives of used copiers. I feel rather foolish that this never occurred to me. What happens to your office copier when it breaks down and is replaced, or worse, is traded in for a newer model? Do years of office documents go with it, unencrypted? Among the more interesting things about this video is the revelation that there actually is a proper auto-delete feature available on Sharp copiers — a few extra lines of code for an extra $500, which is about the price of an entire PC today, with Windows installed.

Thanks to Hanspeter Pfister for pointing me to this terrific graphic on how Facebook’s privacy policies have become weaker over the years, and this site that helps you check and modify your own Facebook privacy settings. The New York Times graphic from a few days ago on Facebook privacy also is worth a thousand words (or 5,830, which is actually how long Facebook’s privacy policy now is).

Finally — I was on Emily Rooney’s Greater Boston show last night with Tim Wong, until recently of the Berkman Center, talking about the backlash against Facebook’s new privacy model.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 20th, 2010 at 9:30 am and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.