Early cheap synthroid tablets recognition and appropriate management are essential to prevent asthma symptoms order discount celexa online effects from worsening and decrease the risk of developing severe asthma canadian clomid with FAO. The SSA also may consider someone with HIV buy flovent without prescription or AIDS to have a disability, which qualifies them for buy free accutane best price jelly benefits in the form of monthly income. With these dimensions, order aldactone it can support a wide range of activities, including aerobics, buy generic xalatan plyometrics, jumping rope, and stretching. While this study does not buy cialis no rx directly test a high, it suggests that nicotine works differently amikacin overnight shipping than other psychoactive drugs. A person with this or other overnight gel risk factors may want to discuss their concerns with a diclofenac without prescription healthcare professional. However, steroids are not a long-term treatment, and buy cheapest celexa alternative people with PsA should only use them during flares to relieve.

Democracies are remarkably ready to adopt the censorship technologies of nations they claim to loathe. Our example du jour is the government of South Africa, which proposes to ban Internet pornography. All of it — not just bad stuff like child pornography.

And why not, say the social arbiters within the government? A deputy Home Minister says, “Cars are already provided with brakes and seatbelts… There is no reason why the internet should be provided without the necessary restrictive mechanisms built into it.”

There are a few problems with this idea, to say the least. First is that it won’t work. Any filter will fail to detect encrypted images — though of course you could outlaw encryption. Problem is, you probably want your banking transactions encrypted.

So any porn detector is going to have lots of false negatives.

But there are the false positives too. This is the old problem of figuring out what the government censors will consider pornographic. Perhaps South Africa has figured out how to define it, but I doubt it. Will anatomical atlases be banned? Breastfeeding guides? Sex manuals, for that matter? What about The Ecstasy of St Teresa? Somebody has to decide, and where there is legal liability for guessing wrong, a great deal of worthwhile material will be redacted. Self-censorship works rather well, actually.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 29th, 2010 at 5:24 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.