Blown To Bits

Another “How We Could Know Less”: South Africa Wants to Ban Internet Porn

Saturday, May 29th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
SHOP cheap cialis from usa NOW These softgels are like capsules and include coconut oil, real buy without prescription flaxseed oil, and a lemon flavor. In reviews on Charlotte's viagra no online prescription Web website, buyers mention that the product successfully and quickly order discount (ovral relieved pain. However, it is important to remember that some order viagra without prescription people can experience side effects from the CBD or other arcoxia online stores ingredients in the product. How we vet brands and productsMedical ampicillin prices News Today only shows you brands and products that we lowest price for arcoxia stand behind. Restless leg syndrome (RLS), or Willis-Ekbom disease, is discount nexium a disorder that causes a person to feel an urge 60 in uk to move their legs. The company warns against using this order dexamethasone product if a person undergoes drug testing, as they may buy alesse (ovral l) without prescription test positive. Reviewers also state that the flavorless tincture tastes buy azor like water, which may be beneficial for those who dislike amikacin india the taste of hemp. How we vet brands and productsMedical celexa prescription News Today only shows you brands and products that we stand.

Democracies are remarkably ready to adopt the censorship technologies of nations they claim to loathe. Our example du jour is the government of South Africa, which proposes to ban Internet pornography. All of it — not just bad stuff like child pornography.

And why not, say the social arbiters within the government? A deputy Home Minister says, “Cars are already provided with brakes and seatbelts… There is no reason why the internet should be provided without the necessary restrictive mechanisms built into it.”

There are a few problems with this idea, to say the least. First is that it won’t work. Any filter will fail to detect encrypted images — though of course you could outlaw encryption. Problem is, you probably want your banking transactions encrypted.

So any porn detector is going to have lots of false negatives.

But there are the false positives too. This is the old problem of figuring out what the government censors will consider pornographic. Perhaps South Africa has figured out how to define it, but I doubt it. Will anatomical atlases be banned? Breastfeeding guides? Sex manuals, for that matter? What about The Ecstasy of St Teresa? Somebody has to decide, and where there is legal liability for guessing wrong, a great deal of worthwhile material will be redacted. Self-censorship works rather well, actually.

Comments are closed.