Blown To Bits

Another “How We Could Know Less”: South Africa Wants to Ban Internet Porn

Saturday, May 29th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Also buy free (metacam) called myalgia, muscle aches and pains can involve the joints, buy for cheapest alternatives india ligaments, tendons, and the soft tissues that connect these with clomid bones and organs. Fibromyalgia is an increasingly common type of buy generic metronidazole gel muscle pain that causes widespread intense pain across the body. purchase diclofenac online There is currently no known cure for inflammatory myopathies, but get glyburide some treatments may help to reduce symptoms. Various physical methods order generic prescription prescription and alcohol can help relieve pain, including physical therapy, hot and cold buy acomplia no prescription required therapy, massage, and acupuncture. Psychological treatments for chronic pain include buy celexa generic talking therapies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Tai chi zofran sale is an exercise therapy involving slow, continuous, fluid body movements fda approved drops combined with breathing and relaxation techniques. Each class and type find discount bentyl online of drug work differently, while some may be more suitable buying cheap buy alternatives professional for certain people than others. A study shows that beta-blockers buy generic cheapest problems at low doses can temporarily improve chronic pain in females buy generic atenolol with fibromyalgia and temporomandibular syndrome. Schedule V drugs have accepted medical.

Democracies are remarkably ready to adopt the censorship technologies of nations they claim to loathe. Our example du jour is the government of South Africa, which proposes to ban Internet pornography. All of it — not just bad stuff like child pornography.

And why not, say the social arbiters within the government? A deputy Home Minister says, “Cars are already provided with brakes and seatbelts… There is no reason why the internet should be provided without the necessary restrictive mechanisms built into it.”

There are a few problems with this idea, to say the least. First is that it won’t work. Any filter will fail to detect encrypted images — though of course you could outlaw encryption. Problem is, you probably want your banking transactions encrypted.

So any porn detector is going to have lots of false negatives.

But there are the false positives too. This is the old problem of figuring out what the government censors will consider pornographic. Perhaps South Africa has figured out how to define it, but I doubt it. Will anatomical atlases be banned? Breastfeeding guides? Sex manuals, for that matter? What about The Ecstasy of St Teresa? Somebody has to decide, and where there is legal liability for guessing wrong, a great deal of worthwhile material will be redacted. Self-censorship works rather well, actually.

Comments are closed.