You order discount viagra online should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before order discount cialis online taking any medication. A doctor may also prescribe non-factor replacement zofran therapies to help prevent bleeding or assist in better clotting. estradiol purchase According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, an buy free viagra no prescription dosage insurer may require prior approval of certain types of services buy generic diovan side effects before it provides coverage. If a doctor or lymphatic therapist cost of arcoxia recommends a round-the-clock compression garment, a person can discuss daytime cialis approved versus nighttime sleeves with them. Your doctor will advise you lipitor sale on the dosage and administration of Remicade or Humira that's buy generic viagra side effects right for you. To find out how often side effects occurred.

Democracies are remarkably ready to adopt the censorship technologies of nations they claim to loathe. Our example du jour is the government of South Africa, which proposes to ban Internet pornography. All of it — not just bad stuff like child pornography.

And why not, say the social arbiters within the government? A deputy Home Minister says, “Cars are already provided with brakes and seatbelts… There is no reason why the internet should be provided without the necessary restrictive mechanisms built into it.”

There are a few problems with this idea, to say the least. First is that it won’t work. Any filter will fail to detect encrypted images — though of course you could outlaw encryption. Problem is, you probably want your banking transactions encrypted.

So any porn detector is going to have lots of false negatives.

But there are the false positives too. This is the old problem of figuring out what the government censors will consider pornographic. Perhaps South Africa has figured out how to define it, but I doubt it. Will anatomical atlases be banned? Breastfeeding guides? Sex manuals, for that matter? What about The Ecstasy of St Teresa? Somebody has to decide, and where there is legal liability for guessing wrong, a great deal of worthwhile material will be redacted. Self-censorship works rather well, actually.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 29th, 2010 at 5:24 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.