Blown To Bits

Facebook: More Privacy Woes

Monday, October 18th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
If buy buy no rx you have insurance, your insurance company may require prior authorization buy cheap alesse (ovral l) online before it covers ezetimibe. WHY ARE COSTS DIFFERENT FOR BRAND-NAME sale discount from DRUGS VS. GENERIC DRUGS?Brand-name drugs can be expensive because of certified cheapest the research needed to test their safety and effectiveness. These order discount glucophage sites can provide details about drug assistance programs, ways to buy buy low price make the most of your insurance coverage, and links to discount glyburide savings cards and other services. However, this article should not buy cheap betnovate online be used as a substitute for the knowledge and expertise for pill of a licensed healthcare professional. They can buy guarana in buy atrovent online tablet or capsule form, as liquid, or as a multi-ingredient supplement,.

The Wall Street Journal reports on leakage of Facebook data to the advertising world, even data held behind what were supposed to be Facebook’s highest level of privacy settings.

Why does this keep happening? Surely not by design on Facebook’s part. The company has been bitten enough times over the past year not to be venal without good cause. I have much less confidence in the intermediaries in the leakage, the data aggregation firm Rapleaf for example, which pled that “We didn’t do it on purpose.” Uh-huh.

Facebook is not just a social network any more. It is an entire operating system on top of which applications run. If you take it with a grain of salt and a roll of the eyes that Windows still has bugs, you should not be surprised that Facebook has bugs. And the more innovative and experimental a computer system is the more likely it is to be buggy.

Of course, any software developer does a risk-reward calculation. The people who build air traffic control systems do more careful testing (and more careful design up front) than the people who build social networking sites, because the harm to the company of a failure is lower, and the benefit to the company of a success is higher. Absent liability for privacy failures, Facebook will keep producing neat products that people love, and patching them when someone points out their problems.

Good job by the WSJ journalists, one of whom, Geoff Fowler, was a reporter for the Harvard Crimson (see this piece on diversity, for example), and also a student in my Bits course when he was an undergraduate at Harvard.

2 Responses to “Facebook: More Privacy Woes”

  1. Saketh Says:

    “Good job by the WSJ journalists, one of whom, Geoff Fowler, was a reporter for the Harvard Crimson (see this piece on diversity, for example), and also a student in my Bits course when he was an undergraduate at Harvard.”

    Wow, that’s awesome, professor!

  2. David R Says:

    Very good point. I agree how much traffic flows to Facebook which leads people to entering private information. New age stalker’s and hustler’s are all going through Facebook now. If I could compare Facebook to another some what modern day monopoly it would be Wal-Mart. It’s everywhere, everyone goes to it and everybody knows about it. My point is as long as its popular and has a good amount of users it will keep having problems such as these.