The tetracycline for order best treatment for testicular cancer depends on many factors, such low cost buy as the person's overall health and the type and stage zofran online of the cancer. The American Cancer Society states that in buy canada no rx the United States, the risk of penile cancer is low cheap information among both people who are circumcised and those who are buy robaxin without prescription uncircumcised. According to the Prostate Cancer Foundation, a person would discount buy overnight delivery receive chemotherapy for prostate cancer if they have a certain cheap glyburide type of cancer known as "metastatic." However, researchers say this cialis type of chemotherapy is not yet fully understood, especially for find cheap amoxicillin online prostate cancer. People with advanced prostate cancer may receive platinum chemotherapy.

A year and a half ago I blogged about the case of Steven Warshak, whose email the US government had obtained without a search warrant. At that point the opinion of the court was that no warrant was needed to obtain your email from your ISP. The reasoning was a bit like the original court view of telephone wiretapping–no warrant needed, since after all, what did you think was going to happen to your conversation once it left the confines of your house?

A US court of appeals has now held that the government needs a search warrant to get your email. “Given the fundamental similarities between email and traditional forms of communication,” the court writes, “it would defy common sense to afford emails lesser Fourth Amendment protection.” The court has elected to go with common sense. Bad people do a lot of bad stuff by email, but there is no reason why investigators shouldn’t have to take the same steps to justify their searches they would have to do to open postal mail or listen in on a phone call.

Read the EFF’s announcement, which has a link to the decision.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 15th, 2010 at 10:14 am and is filed under Privacy, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.