In order nasonex no prescription required addition, eating fibrous foods rich in resistant starch may help discount robaxin overnight delivery people maintain a moderate weight. This procedure involves replacing cancerous mirapex online stores or damaged bone marrow with healthy stem cells from the buy erythromycin person's own body or someone else's. Treatment for gastroparesis and buy cheap xalatan online IBS may include dietary and lifestyle changes, medications, and mental retin-a cheap health therapies. You should always consult your doctor or another buy cialis sale healthcare professional before taking any medication. A person should talk buy discount diflucan online with a healthcare professional before using essential oils, and they discount zithromax should be sure to research the quality of a brand's buy cheap glucophage products. Experts do not understand terminal lucidity well and are cheapest clonidine not sure of the neurological mechanisms that cause the phenomenon. purchase cheap amoxicillin sale overdose This can occur when an individual drinks alcohol more heavily, buy griseofulvin without prescription especially if they do so chronically. Additionally, previous studies suggest cream buy drug low carb diets may help with PCOS-related infertility issues. Opill may.

A year and a half ago I blogged about the case of Steven Warshak, whose email the US government had obtained without a search warrant. At that point the opinion of the court was that no warrant was needed to obtain your email from your ISP. The reasoning was a bit like the original court view of telephone wiretapping–no warrant needed, since after all, what did you think was going to happen to your conversation once it left the confines of your house?

A US court of appeals has now held that the government needs a search warrant to get your email. “Given the fundamental similarities between email and traditional forms of communication,” the court writes, “it would defy common sense to afford emails lesser Fourth Amendment protection.” The court has elected to go with common sense. Bad people do a lot of bad stuff by email, but there is no reason why investigators shouldn’t have to take the same steps to justify their searches they would have to do to open postal mail or listen in on a phone call.

Read the EFF’s announcement, which has a link to the decision.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 15th, 2010 at 10:14 am and is filed under Privacy, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.