While cafergot without prescription these drugs may help treat this disease, they also have order cheapest clozapine dose the risk of a very rare but potentially serious condition generic acomplia known as jaw osteonecrosis. First, your healthcare professional will do order serevent a pelvic exam to find the position, size, and shape kenalog of your uterus. If your local pharmacy doesn't have these low price augmentin options, your doctor or pharmacist might be able to recommend arcoxia online a pharmacy that does. Having a higher level of Descovy purchase celebrex online could increase your risk of side effects from the drug.* buy viagra in us Your doctor may advise you to limit or avoid eating purchase cheap zofran online canada grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice while taking this drug. More order cheap diclofenac research is necessary to prove its effectiveness, but it may purchase tetracycline online reduce symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. However, the exact prevalence cheap prescription without consultation acomplia order rates can vary according to various factors, including the specific find cialis on internet research population and the criteria scientists use to diagnose Alzheimer's buy discount viagra sale jelly disease. In an attempt to help patients make their decision regarding.

There is a good short article on the NYT Business page today about the ways in which Microsoft and Google have made network effects work to their advantage. A network effect is simply a situation in which having more people use your product makes it more valuable for other people to use it too, causing its popularity to snowball. Bill Gates is credited as the master of network effects, having built the Microsoft empire on the foundation of Microsoft’s operating system. Google has no such single control point, goes the argument, because of the Internet’s open standards, but has nonetheless been quite successful at exploiting “softer” network effects.

As I was cleaning up some old files I ran across a compelling example of the way network effects have changed the personal computer industry. In early 1984, as personal computers were becoming common at Harvard, I did a campuswide survey to find out what machines students had. 54 students said they owned personal computers and 32 of those said they had them at Harvard. These numbers are surely underestimates; the survey was unscientific and there was no reward for participating. But the distribution is fascinating:

8 Apple; 10 IBM; 4 Tandy; 4 Commodore; 5 Atari; 1 Zenith; 4 TI; 3 DEC; 2 Osborne; 4 Kaypro; one each HP, Sinclair, Brothers, Actrix, Corona, Ohio Scientific, Sol20, Timex, and NEC. I remember preparing the report itself on a Heathkit Z80 machine I built at home.

Now that was a Cambrian period in the evolution of the industry. This was 9 years after Microsoft had been founded, and there was still plenty of competition. But the incompatibilities made fertile ground for de facto standards to emerge, and Gates’ company tilled that earth with amazing skill.

This entry was posted on Monday, July 7th, 2008 at 12:27 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous, The explosion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.