Experts order discount cream online define palliative care as specialized medical care for those living levitra without prescription with a serious illness, such as COPD. Some researchers believe cheap bentyl pill that some people with IBS may have an imbalance in buy griseofulvin bacteria communities in the gut, which may also contribute to tetracycline online stores IBS symptoms such as diarrhea. A doctor will typically perform discount ventolin overnight delivery a TRUS to help them diagnose an issue with the without clomid get prescription discount prostate, such as enlargement or cancer. Allergist/immunologists diagnose, treat, and tablet accutane manage various immunologic conditions, including allergies, asthma, and immunodeficiency diseases. canadian cialis Viruses and bacteria can cause tonsillitis, a throat infection causing dexamethasone for sale painful inflammation and sore throat. People with ADHD also report discount vibramycin experiencing positive traits, such as being passionate, expressive, and creative. buy generic amikacin Symptoms of scalp psoriasis may include fine scaling that resembles cheap erythromycin no prescription dandruff or thick, crust-like plaques that affect the entire scalp. For.

Here’s¬†a good AP column about the way the major players limit what can be said in order to satisfy what they consider appropriate standards of taste. There is a wonderful example of a Dutch photographer whose documentary photo of a street scene in Romania was taken down from Flickr — twice. The problem? It showed a young adolescent boy smoking, as happens a lot on the streets of Romania. Flickr didn’t want to encourage youth smoking, or perhaps didn’t want to be accused of encouraging youth smoking, or perhaps received actual complaints about the photo and found it easier to censor than to argue.

This is a tough problem, as private enterprises should generally be left to do whatever they feel is best for business, and it’s hard to see this kind of censorship as harmful. But as sites like Flickr become the technological equivalent of the public square, attracting huge numbers of participants because a huge number of participants are already there, it’s equally hard not to think that the personal judgments of random employees should not be decisive in what can be shown and what can’t be. And government regulations immediately raise the problem that web sites are multinational and governments aren’t.¬†

This entry was posted on Friday, July 11th, 2008 at 9:09 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.