For cheap sale from canada example, it can make a person feel physically unwell, which buy in malaysia may have a negative effect on their mental health and synthroid online how they respond to stressful situations. If a person with cheapest viagra online CKD thinks they may be experiencing depression or anxiety, they purchase alesse (ovral l) online should speak with a doctor. A person with anxiety may canadian sale free pharmacy also benefit from ACT, which uses mindfulness and goal setting cheap buy no prescription to help reduce a person's symptoms. People in a hypomanic allopurinol for sale state may feel more productive and outgoing, but they can discount (metacam) without prescription still function reasonably well in their daily lives. These episodes pharmacy azor can occur in any combination and may involve abrupt shifts buy generic approved no prescription usa between different mood states. BP is a lifelong condition, but for overnight with proper treatment and support, many people can manage their discount accutane online symptoms and lead fulfilling lives. The researchers prescribed escitalopram (Lexapro) generic non to the antidepressant group, but if they found it ineffective or.

Apparently Congress knows it’s important, but — reasonably enough — can’t pass a law protecting it because it doesn’t know what it is. According to the Washington Post, Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida can recognize it when he sees it — and he doesn’t want his online newspaper keeping track of what he’s reading.

Too late — that’s probably happening right now.

Industry representatives, and some other members of Congress, claim no legislation is needed. Everyone knows privacy is important, so of course the industry has an incentive to safeguard it.

Well, yes; they have an incentive to be seen as guarding it, and also have an incentive to make the most profitable use of the available information. And if you’re a newspaper, for example, you probably can’t afford to throw information away that would be useful to your advertisers.

An interesting question noted in the article is that it’s not even clear what “personally identifying information” is. Is an IP address “personally identifying”? The Recording Industry surely thinks so — they use them to make charges against copyright infringers. But there is hardly a one to one correspondence of IP addresses to individuals.

And by the way, IP addresses are going to be less and less identifying, because we are running out of addresses. These are 32 bit numbers, so there are only about 4 billion of them. They are 85% gone already, and the supply will reportedly be exhausted by 2011. IPv6 with its 128-bit addresses is the solution, and a transition is occurring, but it’s unlikely to have been completed in time. There are workarounds, which will be annoying and clumsy. It would be cleaner if we could all move to IPv6 tomorrow — just as it would have been cleaner if the US had gone to the metric system. In the Internet too, the world won’t come to an end because we haven’t moved to a sensible standard all at once.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 15th, 2008 at 9:50 pm and is filed under Privacy, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.