To cialis generic establish that the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, discount diovan we:.We do the research so you can find trusted products cheapest flagyl for your health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. buy generic amikacin If a person suspects that they or someone nearby is generic cialis info experiencing an allergic reaction or anaphylaxis, they should seek emergency xalatan malaysia medical aid immediately. They can help determine what may be buy discount cialis online causing your lymph nodes to swell and whether you may viagra alternative need treatment for an infection. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) target fda approved zithromax the body's inflammation processes, which help reduce or prevent the order robaxin constant inflammation that causes symptoms of both psoriasis and PsA. buy cheap ampicillin Exercise can be part of weight management, but eating a order free retin-a alternative withdrawal balanced diet is another key element that people can try, even.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.