In augmentin online stores most cases, families will cover the cost of long-term care buy discount cheap themselves, although some people may be eligible for long-term care canadian side effects insurance, Veterans benefits, or Medicaid. In the middle and advanced purchase cheapest cialis online stages of dementia, people may require around-the-clock care to keep buy order without prescription them safe and provide more intensive care. They can provide azor sale ongoing support, including meals, help with medication, and recreational activities. buy cephalexin low price If you develop a side effect while taking Effexor XR cheap cialis in uk and want to tell the FDA about it, visit MedWatch. order dexamethasone on internet Certain side effects of Effexor XR may be more likely buy atenolol than others during the first week of treatment. If you have.

Last April (see MSN Music RIP) I blogged about Microsoft’s decision to shut down the license servers for MSN Music at the end of August, thereby stranding customers who had purchased music tracks governed by MSN Music’s Digital Rights Management. As it turned out, Microsoft reconsidered, and now says that the license servers will operate until at least 2011.

Now Yahoo has joined the DRM customer stranding game with its July 23rd announcement that it will shut down the Yahoo Music Store servers at the end of September. The result will be that anyone who purchased Music Store tracks will be unable to move them to new machines after the deadline. As with Microsoft’s (since retracted) announcement, this is another demonstration that customers don’t really own the music they “purchase” under DRM systems. Instead, they remain dependent on the distributor’s willingness to keep the DRM license servers running: something for which the distributor has given no long-term guarantee.

As Blown to Bits argues, DRM is a bad deal for customers and a bad deal for innovation. It’s also a bad deal for the music distributors themselves, since it obligates them to maintain an ongoing technical infrastructure of license servers. It’s encouraging to see the continuted growth of non-DRM alternatives for music distribution. Now if only Congress would figure out what a bill of goods they’ve been sold by DRM pushers.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 26th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.