However, remeron for order significant differences in blood pressure depending on body position may discount triamterene increase as a person gets older or may indicate certain buy arcoxia sale health conditions, such as supine hypertension or diabetes. However, if buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension an individual's blood pressure always drops significantly when standing up viagra without rx from sitting or lying down, they may have orthostatic hypotension. order no rx cialis Self-measured blood pressure monitoring allows an individual to check their cheap atrovent pill own blood pressure at home. It is important for a get cipro person's body position to remain the same each time they generic clindamycin gel check their blood pressure in order to make sure results cialis uk are not affected by changes in position. Healthcare professionals frequently buy cheap flovent without prescription order blood tests for various reasons, such as monitoring health buy acomplia without prescription status, checking for infection, and helping to diagnose various conditions. get discount discount Private technical schools, community colleges, and adult education programs may cheapest flagyl offer phlebotomy education. To discover more evidence-based information and resources lasix for order for donating blood, visit our dedicated hub. In contrast, those with.

The Massachusetts legislature is considering a bill that would require registration of prepaid cell phones. Here is the beginning of the text of H 4799:

(a) Any person making a retail sale of a prepaid cell phone shall, as a precondition to the sale, obtain and photograph or photocopy one or more documents identifying the purchaser by name and providing his address. The seller shall, for each retail sale, make and keep for a period of 2 years a record which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) the serial number and manufacturer of the phone; (2) the phone number assigned to the cell phone; (3) the service supplier who will supply wireless service to the phone; and (4) a copy of all documents related to the identification of the purchaser.

And of course the retailer would have to turn that information over to the state.

People with bad credit pay cash for these throwaway phones. Immigrants who don’t have papers use throwaway phones. I’ll bet teenagers who don’t want their parents to know who they are talking to buy these phones.

And no doubt drug dealers use these phones. And that is the reason this bill is coming forward–as an aid to the police.

So this is a fairly standard liberty-security issue, of the non-terror variety. It would help the police get the bad guys if they knew they could get data on anyone, good or bad.

But if cell phones, why not email accounts, which you can get without showing ID (with Gmail for example, they are free and set up from the comfort of home)? Or postage stamps–wouldn’t it help the gumshoes if they could trace a cancelled stamp back to the identity of the person who mailed it?

It reminds me of Judge Richard Posner’s view of the FISA surveillance legislation, that it “retains value as a framework for monitoring the communications of known terrorists, but it is hopeless as a framework for detecting terrorists.” What you really want is not to be able to surveil the people you already suspect are terrorists. You want to be able to surveil everyone, and just pick out, from what you learn, the bad guys from the good.

The founding fathers had been through all that, and that’s why they wrote the Fourth Amendment, which guarantees no searches without “probable cause.” As usual with these bills, the people who would be obviously disadvantaged by the loss of privacy are not everyone’s favorites, and that’s the way these bills gain plausibility. Who cares if illegal immigrants can’t get cell phones, or 15-year-olds need their parents’ approval?

But this cell phone bill feels to me like one that trades too much privacy for too little security. I say keep the information out of the hands of the government; it’s none of their business if I want to buy one of these phones.

PS. Excellent opinion piece by Tim Wu in the NYT today about broadband deployment, summarizing, as it happens, the main argument of Chapter 8.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 30th, 2008 at 2:53 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.