A cialis online sales person generally recovers faster with fewer complications when a doctor buy free cafergot removes the stone with PCNL. To find out how often purchase gentamicin eye drops online side effects occurred in clinical trials, see the prescribing information serevent online stores for Crestor. Furthermore, healthcare professionals also assess other factors when cheap methotrexate determining a person's outlook, such as overall health, age, and purchase cheap flagyl sale dangers how well the cancer responds to treatment. It is important cheapest arcoxia to seek emergency medical treatment if symptoms of a severe diflucan prescription allergic reaction occur. Typically, the rash occurs in a single order artane lowest price dosage stripe around the right or left side of the body, drug clindamycin online purchase but sometimes it affects one side of the face. According buy zithromax to the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), treatment is vital purchase generic viagra prescription delivery to manage the symptoms of PsA If someone experiences joint stiffness.

Off at my summer home on a mountain lake, I am trying to read about anything but bits. So I’ve read two good books — Susan Jacoby’s Freethinkers and Jules Tygiel’s Past Time. A history of secularism in America and a history of baseball. Unaccountably, each has a paragraph about the social consequences of improvements in communication technology. And the two paragraphs make closely related points. And the same issues are with us today, and relevant to the debates about whether the Internet can be a democratizing technology, what influence private carriers have over public understanding of the truth, and whether the unlimited availability of information will mean that we will in the end become more isolated through our ability to pick and choose the reality we wish to believe.

Jacoby discusses the influence of early radio on the secularism movement.

The farmers who rode fifty miles across the prairie to hear [famous agnostic orator Robert] Ingersoll in the 1890s were likely to be found in their own living rooms, listening to their own radios, in the 1920s — and radio sponsors did not spend their money to ¬†promote attacks on the God of the Bible. Freethought ideals did survive the disappearance of the freethought movement, but — unlike religious evangelism — they were ill suited, because of their emphasis on facts rather than emotions, to the new mass communications media. (p. 263)

Tygiel talks about how radio spelled the end of public scoreboards in cities, where crowds used to gather to see the telegraphed play-by-play of baseball games posted for public view.

The radio had, in a very important sense, democratized major league baseball, transmitting a more intimate sense of being at the game to millions who could never attend. Yet the process had become more familial or individualistic, replacing the communal experience with a more isolated one. Radio made baseball, more than ever, a national sport, but in a context far removed from earlier meanings of that term. (p. 73)

One of the big points of our book is that the digital explosion is not inevitably either good or bad. More capacity to communicate information does not automatically lead to greater enlightenment and greater democratic empowerment. The future depends on who has the power to control the communication media and how they use it. It’s important for us all to realize that nothing is inevitable — we need to understand, and to watch, what may seem to be struggles over obscure technical points, because the way the future will look may depend on choices being made today.

This entry was posted on Monday, August 18th, 2008 at 12:26 am and is filed under Radio and television. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.