The
discount atrovent cost of speech therapy treatment varies greatly depending on the
buy generic t-ject 60 length of sessions, location, and provider. The test has easy-to-follow
robaxin low price instructions so a person can take a finger-prick blood sample
find triamterene no prescription required and a saliva sample that they should return the same
generic cialis day. Lack of regular weight-bearing exercises, such as walking, running,
buy cialis cheap or weightlifting, can contribute to weaker bones and a higher
find clonidine online risk of osteoporosis. It may also be ok to take
buy cheap colchicine online the occasional short break from wearing a brace, such as
cheap generic tizanidine for a school dance or a sleepover at a friend's
dangers cheapest viagra get house. Those other attributes, however, are what suggest promise for
order xalatan online wound healing, in addition to boosting the immune system. ANSD
zoloft without prescription can make spoken communication between children and their caregivers difficult or.
… but they still face trial, as things stand.
Judge George O’Toole, Jr., not the judge who imposed the gag order on the MIT students who intended to present their research about security problems of the MBTA’s fare system, has allowed that order to expire (CNET story here). The judge did not rule on First Amendment Grounds. He simply decided (correctly) that one of the legal conditions justifying the imposition of the TRO had not been met. To wit: He doubted that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which the students were charged of violating, actually applied to the oral and written communication of research results between human beings. (The law actually governs sending codes to a computer for fraudulent reasons.) The MBTA also failed to show that the students had actually cost it any money.
The MBTA is thinking about what to do. As we argued earlier, they should tend to their business and stop trying to criminalize the messenger.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, August 19th, 2008 at 4:11 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.