Digital Photographic Extremism
Saturday, September 20th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
This purchase free prednisolone low price australia can lead to complications such as cholecystitis, which can cause canadian cialis sudden, severe abdominal pain radiating to the back and shoulder. allopurinol for order Venous ulcers also occur on the lower leg, but they purchase free (ovral low price australia typically develop somewhere between the knee and the ankle. Some triamterene without prescription medications for heart-related conditions, such as high blood pressure and buy discount dexamethasone without prescription info angina, interact with alcohol. Coronary heart disease is a serious cheapest zoloft condition that affects the arteries supplying blood to the heart. cheap acomplia from uk However, anecdotal reports suggest that some drugs for social anxiety cheap erythromycin disorder may relieve the symptoms. The doctor can assess the gentamicin eye drops sale symptoms, perform a comprehensive examination, and order additional tests, if viagra without prescription necessary, to determine the underlying cause of the chest pain. viagra in us Therapists may use VR to allow clients to practice real-life challenges,.
Digital photography, not the palmtop computer, is my favorite example of the triumph of Moore’s Law. Ten years ago we were still using film and Kodak was still making a lot of money doing it. Black and white ISO 400 film could be pushed up to 3200 if you had to underexpose it, but the results looked terrible. With color film pushed negatives would look even worse, and you needed a custom color lab to do it for you.
Today you can buy a Canon EOS SD Mark II, which has 21.1 million pixels per frame, and ISO up to 25600. Those are numbers beyond the imagination of anyone shooting pictures a decade ago.
Of course, in ten years, after the technology moves on, no one will be impressed.