Blown To Bits

A Strange Loop at Wikipedia

Monday, September 22nd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
A remeron sale therapist then guides a person through distressing memories, helping them nasonex overnight integrate the event into their other memories and reducing their buy cheapest viagra on line intensity. The pregnant person's immune system must adapt to recognize order quinine that the fetus, which contains genes from both biological parents, nasonex non prescription is not a threat to the body, even though it compare diovan prices includes material from another genetic source. Taking steps to reduce accutane india exposure to secondhand smoke or quitting smoking may help someone order cialis no prescription reduce risks to their health and the health of those cheapest viagra online around them. If you have insurance, your insurance company may order discount diclofenac online effects require prior authorization before it covers Zoryve. The ability of cipro pharmacy people with advancing dementia to communicate may decrease as their buy cialis no prescription required cognitive and language skills decline. In this article, we look viagra alternative at several apps that may help alleviate feelings of stress and.

Wikipedia is a marvel. In spite of the fact that anyone can edit it and all editing is pseudonymous, it works. For a lot of math theorems, for example, the resource is fantastic for quick lookup. If you’ve never used it, try it for whatever interests you and judge for yourself. If the entry is imperfect, just fix it. You can see the result instantly.

Wikipedia is very inclusive since anyone can start an entry. But there are standards for inclusion; if you try to make an entry for your dog, it will get deleted, unless your dog is famous for some reason.

So, storage being cheap, someone started Deletionpedia, an inventory of all the entries that have been deleted from Wikipedia. It’s kind of interesting, I guess.

And then someone created a Wikipedia page about it.

Which was deleted. Go figure. It was restored, and a debate is raging among Wikipedians about the right and justice of all this. The page is still up for now, but that link may die at any moment.

2 Responses to “A Strange Loop at Wikipedia”

  1. Hilary Says:

    This seems like a more comprehensive version of Wikidumper (http://wikidumper.blogspot.com/), “The Official Appreciation Page for the Best of the Wikipedia Rejects”.

  2. pandora Says:

    Thank you very much for this info. Looking forward to next one.