Hypoxic buy prednisolone online ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a brain injury from the brain generic glucophage not receiving enough oxygen before or shortly after birth. These purchase robaxin online experiences could cause feelings that do not disappear, even after buy cheapest buy no prescription everyone involved is safe and well. For more complex perineal buy viagra tears or damage to the pelvic muscles, a person may order no rx aldactone need surgery to repair the tissue and to perform core buy cheap approved online exercises to strengthen the pelvic floor and improve pelvic floor cheap cialis overnight delivery dysfunction. Mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, psychologists, and price of viagra psychiatrists, can assist people with postpartum PTSD. Healthcare professionals can buy cheapest cialis help support a person and their newborn throughout treatment and recovery..

Just when you thought it might be safe to go back into the water …. the DMCA anticircumvention sharks have started circling again.

Last week I blogged about how it is becoming more and more apparent, to the content industry as well as to consumers, that Digital Rights Management (DRM), enshrined in law through the DMCA’s anticircumvention provision, is a dead-end business model as well as a drag on innovation. See Signs of a Move Towards Balance? (Part 2 of 2).

But not everyone has gotten the message, in particular not the Motion Picture Association of America, which today filed a lawsuit against Real Networks, charging it with violating the DMCA by distributing RealDVD.¬† The RealDVD software lets consumers copy DVDs to their personal computers.¬† It doesn’t permit unlimited copying, but rather uses its own form of DRM to lock the copy to be playable on only a single PC; additional PCs require additional licenses.

What we’re seeing here is another example of the dynamic described in B2B, where the industry uses the Copy Control Association (CCA) licensing scheme to squelch innovations that they don’t like: innovations like RealDVD that (horrors!) make DVDs more friendly¬† for consumers.

Real Networks, for its part, has filed its own suit, asking court to rule that RealDVD is in compliance with the CCA license.¬†¬† That’s not unreasonable: at first blush, RealDVD seems a lot like the Kaleidescape case described in chapter 6 of B2B, where the content industry huffed and puffed, but where the court found there was no license violation.¬† Yet, that was a different court.

Regardless of who wins in court, the fact is that this continues the DMCA’s track record as a dead weight hanging over the head of innovation.¬† Decisions that should be made on the basis of technology and consumer choice are instead being made by courts struggling to interpret a law that was a bad idea when it appeared in 1998 and has revealed itself to be a worse and worse idea every year.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 at 10:34 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.