Blown To Bits

YouTube Responds to McCain

Thursday, October 16th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
A cost clomid doctor may refer the person to a specialist, such as bentyl online sales an ear, nose, and throat doctor, to determine the best order no rx mirapex treatment plan for them. When choosing a support group, a buy cheap levitra online person may want to identify features that might make their order discount (ovral online experience more or less comfortable. Xarelto vs. warfarinYou may wonder viagra without rx how Xarelto compares with other medications that are prescribed for find viagra no prescription required similar uses. The surgeon uses gentle dissection to separate the cheap clindamycin in usa testicles from the surrounding soft tissues, removing them from the buy xalatan no prescription required scrotum. A doctor can provide a person with more information buy cheapest atrovent alternative on ways they can lower their risk of osteoporosis. The cheapest lumigan transplant team will work with the recipient and donor so generic bentyl they know how to look after themselves when they leave levitra drug the hospital. People with a history of disordered eating may discount cialis without prescription have a higher risk of relapsing on a migraine diet or.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

Comments are closed.