These cheap diovan in usa can affect speaking and swallowing and make it difficult to buy cheap celexa online chew food, as the tongue may expel it from the purchase (ovral without prescription mouth. Hyperesthesia comes from the Greek words "hyper," which means generic clomid info "over," and "aesthesis," which means "feeling." Excessive sleepiness could be cost of tizanidine dangerous while driving or performing other tasks that require you clozapine india to be alert. People should also check for symptoms of generic methotrexate prescription professional DVT and report any signs of blood clots to a buy aldactone doctor straight away. Additionally, gas may accumulate in the left order viagra in us upper part of the colon, which may radiate to the cialis online sale chest and appear as heart pain. They also suggested that buy generic griseofulvin prescription it may be possible for a person with AS to have.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 16th, 2008 at 7:19 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.