Blown To Bits

Australian Internet Filtering

Friday, October 17th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
In toradol for order some cases, factors or conditions could prevent your doctor from buy advair without prescription prescribing Ritalin due to the risk of harm. Self-reported dietary cialis in bangkok recall also showed morning participants had a healthier diet and approved pamoate pharmacy less daily energy intake per unit of body weight compared azor sale with other clusters. A doctor may recommend a biological treatment canada betnovate for people with a high fracture risk or who cannot cheap synthroid in uk take oral medication. However, some young people might experience isolation generic robaxin no prescription jelly if their parents have not yet learned sign language. If buying cheap cialis side effects canada a person's condition means that they need hospital treatment while order viagra without prescription in hospice care, a hospice organization must make the arrangements. BDD.

Hard on the heels of yesterday’s story about logging all phone calls made, emails sent, and web sites visited in the UK, comes a story about a plan to filter all Internet content in Australia. Users would be able to opt out of the child-friendly level of filtering, but that would only drop you to a level where all illegal content would be filtered.

Problem is, of course, that what’s illegal can’t be determined automatically. Even filters against illegal pornography will inevitably filter much lawful content as well.

And then there is the small problem of encryption. When you make an online purchase using a credit card, no one on the path between your computer and the store’s computer can tell that the data packet being transmitted contains an encrypted credit card number. How could any government filter know that a packet contains illegal pornography (or, in the case of the child-friendly filter, material unsuitable for children)?

What about dirty jokes in obscure foreign languages? What about email discussing illegal acts — does that also qualify as illegal?

Such schemes are absurd, but that does not make them any less scary. There are many more surveillance camera enclosures sold than surveillance cameras. You only have to have people believe they are being watched to change their behavior.

Comments are closed.