Blown To Bits

Australian Internet Filtering

Friday, October 17th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Additionally, order diovan having a weakened immune system makes it harder for a buy generic buy cost oral person to fight all kinds of infections, including shingles. The cheapest aldactone virus can spread to people who have not received the pyrantel pamoate shingles vaccine and have never had chickenpox. While shingles is generic arcoxia sale information not dangerous for many people, in very rare cases it atenolol no prescription can cause pneumonia, inflammation of the brain, and death. According discount viagra to the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), people need to certified bentyl care for their shingles rash daily. Shingles appears as a generic prozac rash on the skin's surface, but it can also affect generic prozac the nerves and be itchy, painful, and uncomfortable. The rash order generic buy prescription and alcohol is often red in color on lighter skin tones, but buy cheap tetracycline online it may appear purple, pinkish, or brown on darker skin buy cheap levitra online tones. To lower the risk of infection, a person should buy cheap artane ensure to keep the area clean and dry, apply a thin.

Hard on the heels of yesterday’s story about logging all phone calls made, emails sent, and web sites visited in the UK, comes a story about a plan to filter all Internet content in Australia. Users would be able to opt out of the child-friendly level of filtering, but that would only drop you to a level where all illegal content would be filtered.

Problem is, of course, that what’s illegal can’t be determined automatically. Even filters against illegal pornography will inevitably filter much lawful content as well.

And then there is the small problem of encryption. When you make an online purchase using a credit card, no one on the path between your computer and the store’s computer can tell that the data packet being transmitted contains an encrypted credit card number. How could any government filter know that a packet contains illegal pornography (or, in the case of the child-friendly filter, material unsuitable for children)?

What about dirty jokes in obscure foreign languages? What about email discussing illegal acts — does that also qualify as illegal?

Such schemes are absurd, but that does not make them any less scary. There are many more surveillance camera enclosures sold than surveillance cameras. You only have to have people believe they are being watched to change their behavior.

Comments are closed.