Blown To Bits

More on Voting

Monday, October 27th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
You best price advair should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before buy viagra no rx taking any medication. These may include anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, biologics, cipro pill or other targeted therapies. This occurs because researchers tend to compazine sale publish studies that show a significant effect and may not get cheap gel online effects take the time to write up negative findings. This encourages buy diclofenac without prescription people to suggest adjustments to their treatment plans and doctors best price allopurinol to make adjustments that are likely to be beneficial. And cheap 60 overnight delivery the paperwork, sometimes called the medication guide or patient package cephalexin tablet insert, may contain details about interactions. According to the National gel generic order Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), eating a balanced diet buy generic petcam (metacam) oral suspension and limiting excess alcohol may help prevent a type of get discount toradol low white blood cell count called lymphopenia. Risks for those buy compazine online who are pregnant and nursing are unknown, and black currant seed.

As we discussed recently, electronic voting is an extremely tough problem, because it requires voters to have confidence that their votes are being recorded correctly, and to be unable to prove to anyone else how they voted. The two conditions can be achieved with the aid of cryptography — in theory. But it’s also essential that the system be simple to use and works in such a way that the general public will have confidence that there are no scams embedded in the software somehow.

There is a nice article in Salon on a couple of fairly realistic voter-verifiable election systems, including one by Ben Adida, who worked with Hal at MIT and is associated with Harvard’s Center for Research on Computation and Society. There’s progress and reason for hope, but it’s also possible that a bad experience in the upcoming election with some completely unrelated kind of electronic voting machines could increase resistance for any kind of continued deployment of better-designed systems.

Comments are closed.