If lasix without prescription a person suffers from pain due to spinal stenosis, this buy cheapest cialis online pain may worsen when they walk up or down a cheap alesse (ovral l) hill, ramp, or steps. Alternatively, a doctor may stop treatment cheapest betnovate with an anti-androgen for some time and monitor a person's cheap cipro no prescription condition for changes. You can use Airsupra when needed to best price lasix reduce asthma symptoms and help relieve or prevent an asthma buy cheap robaxin attack. A person should consult with a doctor to determine purchase cheap estradiol without prescription india which treatment will be most effective and safest for them pharmacy ampicillin to try. Braces can effectively manage scoliosis by preventing a order viagra on internet person's atypical spinal curvature from worsening. Right after you've used cheap norvasc a syringe or autoinjector, dispose of it in an FDA-approved buy nexium without prescription sharps disposal container. The absence of warnings or other information order discount asacol online effects for a given drug does not indicate that the drug order cheap cialis work or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients.

A huge sword that has been hanging over Google Books was lifted today, when the company came to terms with representatives of U.S. authors and publishers. Those groups had claimed that by scanning in copyrighted works and making them available in limited form, Google was infringing their copyrights. Google here explains how book search will work in the future. In essence, the company will add an option so you can buy access to the full, scanned version of a copyrighted work. You won’t be able to download it, but you’ll be able to access it any time you log into your Google account. Libraries will be able to buy institutional subscriptions. An independent rights registry will be created to figure out where the money should go, in the (very large) case of copyrighted works for which the copyright holder is unknown (orphaned works).

Many, many details will determine whether this is a good deal for society or not. A lot depends on the price points, where the kitty of undistributed money goes, and so on. Any time an important issue like this is settled out of court, it’s a two-edged sword. On the one hand, most people will continue to get the service they’ve gotten used to and the courts have not gotten in the way. On the other hand, the underlying legal questions have not been settled, and could come back in another form.

Update: The settlement involves payments by Google of at least $80 million up front. The full details are available here, including how the user payments will be divided among the parties going forward. Again, the bottom line is that Google never admitted to doing anything wrong and the publishers never agreed that what Google was doing was within “fair use,” so the most important copyright questions may come back to bite us another day.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 at 11:36 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.