Because sale zofran they do not have to undergo the same human and cheap atarax no rx animal studies as brand-name drugs, FDA-approved generic drugs are significantly celebrex for order less expensive. Bisphosphonates are small molecules that bind to the buy accutane us surface of damaged bones, where they inhibit and destroy osteoclasts. tetracycline online sale If you're not sure whether you'll need to get prior buy cheap lasix online authorization for Amjevita, contact your insurance company. To find out order atenolol from canada how the cost of this generic drug compares with the find cheap arcoxia online cost of Femara, talk with your doctor, pharmacist, or insurance pamoate free delivery provider. This enables the immune system to build up a glyburide pharmacy online natural defense, which it applies when there is exposure to order estradiol overnight delivery mold on a larger scale. Doctors may recommend that fit order estrace low price drugs individuals who responded well to initial intensive chemotherapy treatments undergo (ovral purchase low free price a stem cell transplant, which studies suggest may improve outcomes and.

Siva Vaidhyanathan has a good summary of the deal, in the details of which may lie the devil. Like me, he regrets that we won’t now get any clarification on the limits of fair use in the digital age — though he thinks Google would have lost, which would have been a disaster since it would have strengthened the hand of the content industry to keep cracking down on people using small amounts of material for commentary or indexing.

He notes that as long as we rely on Google book search, it’s better for us if it works better. And it will work better — Google will be free to show larger excerpts from copyrighted works. But the deal also will firm up Google’s status as the dominant digital book depository. And in light of the anti-trust issue that raises, Siva notes an interesting coincidence: Google CEO Eric Schmidt hit the road campaigning for Barack Obama last week, just at the moment when the parties must have been hammering out the final draft of this agreement.

And finally, he cautions us not to get too excited about the deal until the court has approved it.

In a related development, Harvard has announced that its library won’t be extending its cooperation with Google to its collection of in-copyright materials, because the deal places too many restrictions on the ways in which they would be made available. Google has been digitizing only the out-of-copyright works in Harvard’s collection, though apparently Harvard’s position has been that Google’s entire project was legal. Not clear to me that Harvard’s decision poses any great problems for Google, since there tend to be multiple sources for copyrighted works.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 30th, 2008 at 9:00 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.