A buy cheap diclofenac healthcare professional may perform different tests to help determine the discount clindamycin gel cause of a person's status epilepticus. Limited research on animals order amikacin and anecdotal evidence suggest using virgin coconut oil to treat buy cialis from canada dry eyes is safe. While some people might make substantial dexamethasone no prescription gains in working memory which last over time, others could advair online stores notice little effect. Emotional or mental triggers may cause episodes cheap spiriva price dangers of chest pain, such as family or school difficulties. Antiviral order cheapest atarax low cost dosage medication is most effective when people take it as soon buy viagra as possible after noticing a shingles rash. It isn't known cheap cialis online for certain whether Symbicort is a safe treatment option for buy generic triamterene best price people with liver problems. Viltepso is approved to treat Duchenne muscular.

Chris Soghoian has a fascinating article about filtering of search engine results in Argentina. This is different from what we write about that happens in China, where the lens is distorted. In Argentina, if you search for certain people using Yahoo!, you get back nothing at all. And it’s not because of official government policy; it’s because of private litigation. Someone simply goes to court and asks the judge to make them disappear, the judge enjoins the search engine company, and disappear they do. Google responds differently than Yahoo!, and there are many easy workarounds for those who experiment, but it seems to be a great leap forward in treating search engines just as a manipulable tool, not a public utility.

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 13th, 2008 at 4:24 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.