Search Engine Filtering in Argentina
Thursday, November 13th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
It buy diclofenac online involves various surgical techniques to modify facial features that can generic zofran provide numerous benefits, including improved mental health, enhanced self-confidence, and cheap price buy alignment with one's gender identity. Long-term alcohol use can affect buy generic mirapex the functioning of the liver, which could mean doctors need erythromycin sale to adjust the dose of anesthesia they would typically use. generic without rx Drinking more than two drinks per day can increase the diovan without prescription risks of various postoperative complications. Doctors can help a person buy diflucan without prescription withdraw from alcohol safely and may prescribe medications such as cialis for sale benzodiazepines to ease the symptoms of withdrawal. Stopping smoking in purchase discount cafergot sale the weeks before surgery can also help reduce the risks accutane without rx of complications from anesthesia. Leading up to the operation, a overnight arcoxia doctor may request a person change their typical diet to order buy without prescription a liquid diet to start weight loss. Each meal should cost prescription be high in protein, and drinking water or other clear liquids.
Chris Soghoian has a fascinating article about filtering of search engine results in Argentina. This is different from what we write about that happens in China, where the lens is distorted. In Argentina, if you search for certain people using Yahoo!, you get back nothing at all. And it’s not because of official government policy; it’s because of private litigation. Someone simply goes to court and asks the judge to make them disappear, the judge enjoins the search engine company, and disappear they do. Google responds differently than Yahoo!, and there are many easy workarounds for those who experiment, but it seems to be a great leap forward in treating search engines just as a manipulable tool, not a public utility.