For cheap toradol PsA, treatment can include medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, buy cheap pyrantel pamoate biologics, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, along with physical therapy and cialis online sale exercise. A person may need to stay in the hospital cheap diflucan from usa if the infection is severe or they require IV antibiotics, purchase cheapest glucophage online which a doctor administers directly into a vein. It's natural buy generic dexamethasone cost work for extra air to end up in the digestive system, viagra online without a prescription either from swallowing air or gas created during digestion. Talk clindamycin australia with your doctor or pharmacist, who can provide personalized guidance purchase cheap azor low cost consultation about cost issues related to modafinil. Most of Symtuza's side cialis rx effects are mild and get better quickly as your body gets.

In a new low for abuse of copyright, Toyota has demanded that a site providing desktop backgrounds remove all images that contain a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus, even in a photography whose copyright is properly held by a third party. The site asked Toyota to identify which images in particular needed to be removed, and Toyota responded that if they had to go to the trouble of identifying what they were objecting to, they would have to be paid for their work.

What’s interesting about this case is what is being used is not the DMCA, but the threat of DMCA. To issue a DMCA takedown, Toyota would have to be specific. The company is apparently claiming that no one can use a photo in which one of their cars appears without infringing their copyright on the design of the car. Extraordinary (and stupid — don’t they want the free publicity of Toyota cars on desktops?).

Also, Professor Charles Nesson has been getting great publicity for his attempt to have the DMCA ruled unconstitutional, essentially because it is a criminal statute dressed up in civil garb. The penalties are extraordinarily high, and none of the protections available to criminal defendants are accorded to those the recording industry comes after. That is why so few cases make it to trial, and the industry can continue its attacks unabated by any risk of losing a case.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.