The ampicillin prescription perfusionist monitors a person's vitals, which includes maintaining normal blood order zoloft flow, body temperature, and other signs. There is no cure prozac discount buy online info for UC, but the available treatment can help manage symptoms, order viagra lowest price dosage calm inflammation, and increase remission periods between flare-ups. Treatments for cheap cialis on internet Bertolotti syndrome can include NSAIDs, physical therapy, corticosteroid injections, and buy augmentin side effects work surgery. Healthcare professionals who practice allopathic medicine tend to take find cheap prozac online an evidence-based approach when they treat disease. It usually happens buy t-ject 60 without prescription due to ischemia, when one or more of the coronary buy cheapest diovan no prescription arteries becomes narrow or blocked. To learn more about these buy cheap vibramycin online conditions, see the "Ciprofloxacin for UTIs" and "Ciprofloxacin for other uses".

In a new low for abuse of copyright, Toyota has demanded that a site providing desktop backgrounds remove all images that contain a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus, even in a photography whose copyright is properly held by a third party. The site asked Toyota to identify which images in particular needed to be removed, and Toyota responded that if they had to go to the trouble of identifying what they were objecting to, they would have to be paid for their work.

What’s interesting about this case is what is being used is not the DMCA, but the threat of DMCA. To issue a DMCA takedown, Toyota would have to be specific. The company is apparently claiming that no one can use a photo in which one of their cars appears without infringing their copyright on the design of the car. Extraordinary (and stupid — don’t they want the free publicity of Toyota cars on desktops?).

Also, Professor Charles Nesson has been getting great publicity for his attempt to have the DMCA ruled unconstitutional, essentially because it is a criminal statute dressed up in civil garb. The penalties are extraordinarily high, and none of the protections available to criminal defendants are accorded to those the recording industry comes after. That is why so few cases make it to trial, and the industry can continue its attacks unabated by any risk of losing a case.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.