However, purchase cheapest zoloft price tablet this article should not be used as a substitute for cheap robaxin online the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. Medical order cialis no prescription imaging tests, such as X-rays, may assess the person's posture retin-a discount buy online info and the extent of spinal damage. It suggests that untreated petcam (metacam) oral suspension for order OSA may double the risk of AFib recurrence after treatment discount ventolin with cardioversion. In some cases, the physical, emotional, and psychological flagyl uk effects of pregnancy may increase the risk of developing or buy cafergot experiencing a relapse in eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa. order robaxin When someone feels the compulsive urge to eat without any (metacam) overdose online purchase free control, distracting themselves with alternative activities could help prevent a spiriva for sale binge eating episode. A Roman doctor found that patients with gout.

In a new low for abuse of copyright, Toyota has demanded that a site providing desktop backgrounds remove all images that contain a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus, even in a photography whose copyright is properly held by a third party. The site asked Toyota to identify which images in particular needed to be removed, and Toyota responded that if they had to go to the trouble of identifying what they were objecting to, they would have to be paid for their work.

What’s interesting about this case is what is being used is not the DMCA, but the threat of DMCA. To issue a DMCA takedown, Toyota would have to be specific. The company is apparently claiming that no one can use a photo in which one of their cars appears without infringing their copyright on the design of the car. Extraordinary (and stupid — don’t they want the free publicity of Toyota cars on desktops?).

Also, Professor Charles Nesson has been getting great publicity for his attempt to have the DMCA ruled unconstitutional, essentially because it is a criminal statute dressed up in civil garb. The penalties are extraordinarily high, and none of the protections available to criminal defendants are accorded to those the recording industry comes after. That is why so few cases make it to trial, and the industry can continue its attacks unabated by any risk of losing a case.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.