This buy generic xalatan may be due in part to their overall effectiveness in generic zoloft withdrawal treating conditions that are traditionally difficult to treat, such as fda approved viagra cancer and psoriatic arthritis. This may involve periods of gentle order tizanidine without prescription exercise followed by short breaks or naps throughout the day, purchase cafergot online as needed. According to research, unprocessed or minimally processed foods alesse (ovral l) sale have associations with a lower risk of chronic disease. The discount cream overnight delivery Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care must support or accredit discount viagra overnight delivery the respiratory therapy education program. Therefore, close monitoring and regular zithromax follow-ups with healthcare providers are crucial to ensure effective treatment order arcoxia online outcomes. People may have systemic treatments to target lung metastases, cheap celebrex tablet such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, or immunotherapy. They buy estradiol valerate online may have a more monotone affect when speaking, which forms buy griseofulvin online part of a group of speech disorders known as dysarthria. real nexium without prescription Antidepressants may help with episodes of uncontrollable laughter or crying, which.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.