A
purchase nexium online person may be entitled to Social Security benefits, Medicaid, and
artane for sale other forms of financial support at varying points throughout the
order cheap buy disease. Doctors may prescribe people medications that can help manage
buy generic cephalexin cost professional or temporarily reduce their AD symptoms. Although scientists have not
order cheap no rx yet found a cure for AD, doctors may be able
order cheap for to prescribe medication or therapy to help with AD symptoms.
buy generic viagra online LBD is a neurological disease that involves irregular deposits of
cheap cialis on internet a protein called alpha-synuclein in the brain. As LBD can
cheap cialis without prescription cause frustration or embarrassment during an episode, it can help
acomplia sale those who experience LBD to tell people around them about
buy clindamycin gel without prescription the condition. It is also important for those providing care to.
Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”
I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?
Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?
This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.