A buy viagra cheap person may notice a return or increase in the volume find cheap asacol of menstrual flow that often surpasses previous levels. Transdermal administration compare atenolol prices is when a drug enters the body through the skin, buy generic clomid such as via a cream, gel, ointment, or patch. This order griseofulvin no prescription suggests that perhaps there is a place for prophylactic intake buy generic advair of spinach extract for people at risk of wounding, and cialis online sale for people with diabetes in particular. Here's a quick look ventolin us at the dosage and administration of Humira and Entyvio for pharmacy methotrexate the conditions both drugs treat. However, this article should not order cipro on internet be used as a substitute for the knowledge and expertise lumigan prescription of a licensed healthcare professional. People with ADHD can experience find cheap cialis online difficulties with executive function, which is the ability to plan one's.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.