Blown To Bits

A New Form of Internet Censorship

Sunday, November 30th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
A lumigan no prescription person may use a platform that keeps track of their purchase lasix without prescription expenses and documents receipts required by their payers. Factors that purchase clozapine online may affect the price you'll pay include your treatment plan, approved zofran pharmacy your insurance coverage, and the pharmacy you use. People should synthroid work with a medical team to identify the right type atrovent of treatment for their specific circumstances. (To learn whether Taltz estradiol valerate interacts with supplements, herbs, or vitamins, see the "Taltz and levitra for order other interactions" section below.) However, this article should not be compare spiriva prices used as a substitute for the knowledge and expertise of buy flovent from canada a licensed healthcare professional. They might have difficulty identifying and buying viagra cost expressing their feelings, leading to emotional numbing, emotional outbursts, or bentyl cost difficulty forming healthy emotional connections with others. While there is zofran cost currently no cure for PFH, there are many treatment options no rx pamoate that can partially or nearly eliminate PFH symptoms. Symptoms of an.

I’ve been writing about Internet censorship, not just in Blown to Bits but in the Boston Globe (The Dangers of Internet Censorship). In a fascinating piece entitled Blacklisted in Cyberspace, James McGrath Morris describes a form of censorship I hadn’t encountered, consciously at least.

Morris publishes a monthly newsletter about the craft of writing biographies. Hardly sexy stuff, you’d think.

He runs his copy through a spam-checking software tool, to see if the spam filters of his recipients’ email servers or personal computers are likely to discard the newsletter before it is even delivered. He was shocked to discover that his last issue had a spam score that was through the roof. Why? I’ll quote:

Three sets of words among the issue’s many articles could derail my e-mail: a reference to “young adult,” a common classification for books intended for adolescent readers; a sentence in my editorial — “Speaking of legal matters, it’s getting nasty out there” — referring to the growing number of lawsuits; and a distinguished biographer’s discussion of writing a book for children that included the following comment: “At my public library I queried the children’s division librarian — what works, what does not, who is ‘hot.'”¬†The inclusion of “young adult,” “getting nasty” and “hot” among the thousands of words in my publication was like poison.

What’s an author to do? “Write around” these everyday phrases to satisfy the demands of the spam-checking software? Perhaps — but if the next release of the software is even more censorious, where would it end?

Comments are closed.