Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Pneumonia colchicine is an infection of the lungs that results in the kenalog online without prescription buildup of fluid or pus in the air sacs of drops approved the lungs. Secondary AML is a form of leukemia that purchase diovan online can occur after a person has had a previous blood buy generic cafergot condition or treatment for cancer. Because of this, there has find discount viagra been a major effort to detect and control them with buy viagra no prescription required infection prevention and control programs. Mixed episode bipolar disorder occurs discount viagra no rx when people experience symptoms of mania and depression at the order free tetracycline alternative withdrawal same time. This is because both conditions can cause muscle dangers cheapest diovan get twitching and cramps, muscle weakness, and reduction of muscle mass. viagra overnight The condition has no known cause, but it is linked betnovate vendors to tenderness at the point where the two branches of cialis cost the carotid artery divide. Healthcare professionals may refer to the characteristic.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.