Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
It cheapest cialis prices will increase energy, but changes to diet and water intake buy generic norvasc cost professional can also help prevent fluid buildup in the body. Some generic clomid people have idiopathic hives, or chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), which cheapest estradiol valerate means there is no identifiable cause. Erectile dysfunction can be estrace cheap a sign of other health conditions that require medical attention methotrexate online stores and treatment. Depending on the type of infection requiring treatment, advair overdose online purchase free doctors may administer medications orally or intravenously — which involves purchase viagra without prescription injecting them directly into the veins. Deciding on the kind generic acomplia of treatment depends on several factors, such as the stage buy free serevent prescription of the cancer, as well as age and overall state mirapex of health. Doctors recommend venoarterial ECMO for problems with the cialis discount heart and lungs and venovenous ECMO for lung problems only. buy cheap remeron However, it notes that some stress or anxiety factors that compazine buy drug people may associate with vaccination can make tinnitus more intrusive. A.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.