Blown To Bits

Freedom of Texting

Friday, April 11th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Some buy no rx celebrex research suggests that coconut oil may be an effective remedy purchase cialis overnight delivery for people with mild to moderate skin infections. Those who best price for amikacin do not have sensitive skin may be able to apply lasix online stores the tea tree oil directly to the affected skin without generic quinine diluting it first. Those who are likely to spread ringworm synthroid without prescription to others through their job or lifestyle — such as amikacin purchase low free price teachers and athletes — should see their doctor promptly. Experts celexa for order believe that the spread of Chagas disease is due to buy cheap compazine online the increased movement of people between countries. According to the buy mirapex Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), some people do order cheap no sale dosage not experience any symptoms during the acute phase of Chagas buy cheap diclofenac disease. It is possible for pregnant women to pass T. approved diovan pharmacy cruzi onto their children during pregnancy or childbirth. Triatomine bugs generic viagra cheap live in forest ecosystems and inside homes that have plenty generic clindamycin gel of cracks and crevices where they can hide. People should see.

If you use your phone to talk about how bad your phone company is, could the phone company cut off your service?

The answer, believe it or not, seems to be, “It depends.” If you are merely talking on the phone, then no, the phone company has to let you do it. But if you are texting, the answer seems to be yes, your service could legally be terminated.

The reason this gets tricky even to explain is that there really is no such thing as a phone company any more. Verizon, which absorbed my old land line company, sells video services. Comcast, which used to be my cable TV company, now provides my residential “land line” service.

“Common carrier” laws have applied in the past to railroads (they couldn’t pick and choose among passengers; anyone with the money to buy a ticket is equally entitled to a seat) and to telephones (so phone companies couldn’t pick and choose their customers on political grounds, for example). As discussed in Blown to Bits, Verizon denied Naral Pro-Choice America the opportunity to create a text messaging group on the basis that it might be used for ‘controversial’ messages. It backed down on the case but not on its legal right to discriminate as it chose.

The FCC is now accepting comments on how text messaging should be treated in the code, like telephoning, where the service provider can’t control what the customers say, or like broadcasting, where the people who own the antenna get editorial control over what gets said. If you think this is a ridiculous no-brainer, you’re mistaken. It’s a real battle and the FCC needs to hear from as many people as possible.

The easiest thing to do is to go to the webform on the Public Knowledge site and to fill it out. PK also has a great deal more information about the issue. There is only a short window of opportunity; please act!

Comments are closed.