Google Opens a Door to Competition
Monday, December 22nd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Seeking purchase cheap synthroid sale overdose medical help can allow a doctor to find the cause cialis bangkok of the sciatica and treat it, which may reduce the purchase cheapest pamoate price tablet chance of the pain recurring. This is because several factors get cheapest augmentin low price canada can influence blood pressure, and having multiple readings can help levitra bangkok doctors understand if the high blood pressure is persistent. Tighten buy erythromycin low price the thigh muscles of the affected leg and slowly raise cheapest aldactone it — in a controlled manner — to the height buying cialis of the other knee. Treatment options for sleep apnea include generic betnovate side effects and alcohol CPAP therapy, which can help keep the airway open during buy free norvasc best price jelly sleep and improve oxygen levels in the body. For resistance training.
Google, whose mission is to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible, has decided not to organize and make accessible the world’s scientific data. In the interests of economizing, it is canceling its scientific data service, which promised to store massive quantities of scientific date, from the Hubble telescope for example, for shared use.
Google offers lots of wonderful stuff “for free,” and it’s not surprising that in a recession the company is picking its shots. But as Wired reports, Amazon, which also offers cloud data services, is waiting in the wings and may rush in to fill the void.
December 23rd, 2008 at 7:58 pm
I was a beta-tester for their datasets service and have attended a number of talks by some of the engineers working on the project. I suspect that Google underestimated the likelihood that scientists would share their data online. Several studies have suggested there is significant resistance towards data sharing amongst researchers, despite the majority agreeing that the open availability of data for reproducibility and verification of results is necessary for the progress of science:
Campbell, E et al. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA. 2002;287:473-480. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/287/4/473
Sterling, T. Analysis and Reanalysis of Shared Scientific Data. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1988;495,1:49-60
http://ann.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/495/1/49
Vogeli C et al. Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2006 Feb;81(2):128-36.
The old aphorism “if you build it, they will come” is far from true…
December 24th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
There’s another old aphorism, “Follow the money.”