Blown To Bits

Two Newspaper Items of Note

Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
ALLERGIC cheapest buying REACTIONAs with most drugs, some people can have an allergic order cheap allopurinol work reaction after taking Orserdu. What to do in case you find discount australia online take too much OrserduIf you think you've taken too much buy generic amikacin problems of this drug, call your doctor. If you're currently breastfeeding buy cheap remeron or planning to do so, talk with your doctor before buy no rx taking this medication. You should always consult your doctor or buying cheap buy side effects canada another healthcare professional before taking any medication. Doctors may perform cheap mirapex a CBC following a diagnosis of breast cancer to help cost cheap inform decisions about cancer treatment. Red blood cells deliver oxygen buy pyrantel pamoate to the body's tissues and transport carbon dioxide back to the.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

Comments are closed.