Individuals artane online stores with primary hypothyroidism should speak with a healthcare professional to viagra overnight learn more about treatment options. If you have a mitochondrial buy metronidazole gel without prescription disorder that affects your liver, talk with your doctor before buy generic erythromycin taking Depakote. However, older adults may be more likely to canada 60 have certain health conditions affecting how their bodies respond to order diovan overnight delivery Epidiolex. If someone suspects they may have foot dyshidrotic eczema, zyprexa no prescription a dermatologist must conduct a complete examination before diagnosing them. compazine side effects pill Some, but not all, research on proton therapy suggests that cheap flovent online it could prolong a person's life, either on its own diflucan no prescription or as part of a therapeutic regimen that includes surgery. Nonfunctional.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 at 3:21 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.