During cheapest generic diclofenac online this period, proper nutrition plays a vital role in the buy cheapest viagra online development of the brain, skeletal system, and organs. Medicare may vibramycin online stores cover some types of eye care, and where coverage is zyprexa online stores available, contact lenses or eyeglasses should be obtained from a buy celexa Medicare-enrolled supplier only. Asexuality isn't actually about gender identity, although buy cialis on internet people who are asexual are less likely to be cisgender. get discount quinine The faster someone responds to possible signs of a heart augmentin in australia attack, the better the outlook and effectiveness of the care viagra order they receive. People should perform regular self-examinations to detect any order viagra without prescription lumps or changes in their testicles and to seek medical cialis professional attention if they notice any abnormalities. These thoughts can be atenolol professional distressing, as a person's sexual orientation can be an important part.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 at 3:21 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.