Those approved buy pharmacy with occasional dry eye symptoms may consider contact lens rewetting buy t-ject 60 drops for short-term relief. There are various reasons why this buy vibramycin online might affect a person in the summer, including dry air, pyrantel pamoate for sale wind, heat, and airborne allergens. People can contact a doctor tablet no to determine the underlying cause if their dry eye symptoms approved india do not improve with home treatments. Blinking exercises can also generic cheapest withdrawal help increase the lipid layer quality and the time it buy dexamethasone on line takes for tears to break up. Evidence suggests that inflammation generic azor withdrawal could underlie dry eye disease, and EFAs may help produce buy generic overnight cost work anti-inflammatory products in the body. Experts have not established whether buy cheap atarax internet black currant seed oil is safe for those who are buy amikacin no prescription sample pregnant or nursing. Other dry eye treatments may include artificial discount diflucan no rx tears, prescription medications, blocking the tear ducts, warm compresses, massage, aldactone online stores and certain eyelid cleansers. Amniotic membranes have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties,.

Bella English has a good piece in the Globe today about JuicyCampus, the gossip site for all manner of cruel and mean-spirited postings about college students. She’s got the story pretty much right — what JuicyCampus is doing is appalling and, under CDA section 230, legal. An interesting detail she notes is that two states’ Attorneys General are investigating JuicyCampus for not enforcing its own rules against fraud. In the aftermath of the Lori Drew conviction, such charges may not be over-reaching.

As the article notes, there are mechanisms for at least trying to identify who posts a message if it’s truly defamatory (which requires showing actual damage, not mere cruelty). It’s onerous to bring a libel charge (thanks to the First Amendment), but I’m a bit surprised it hasn’t been attempted — the article, at least, mentions the possibility but not any actual cases where it’s been done. (Though JuicyCampus has turned over IP addresses in other cases where violent crimes seemed to be in the offing.)

This entry was posted on Monday, December 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pm and is filed under Social computing, Surveillance, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.