However, celebrex pharmacy online if their blood sugar remains high, a doctor may recommend synthroid side effects trying medication, such as insulin, to manage it. This antibiotic asacol online stores interferes with the bacterial cell wall in an attempt to buy cialis destroy the wall and the bacteria. Publication bias can cause buy cheap prednisolone online positive results to become exaggerated, because the findings do not cost cialis incorporate neutral or negative results. If people test negative during buy artane from canada this time, which healthcare professionals call a window period, they generic cialis cheap could still have HIV. The authors note that robotic-assisted laparoscopic order glucophage radical prostatectomies may be as effective as open radical prostatectomies, viagra prices which involve removing the prostate without the assistance of robotic generic aldactone no prescription jelly technology. Reducing time on social media, promoting authenticity, and learning buy generic allopurinol how to stay safe online can help reduce the risk cheap (metacam) of mental health consequences. Hep B screening tests can help viagra buy online determine if a person has hepatitis B and whether the cipro for sale virus is transmissible to other people. According to the Arthritis Foundation,.

Bella English has a good piece in the Globe today about JuicyCampus, the gossip site for all manner of cruel and mean-spirited postings about college students. She’s got the story pretty much right — what JuicyCampus is doing is appalling and, under CDA section 230, legal. An interesting detail she notes is that two states’ Attorneys General are investigating JuicyCampus for not enforcing its own rules against fraud. In the aftermath of the Lori Drew conviction, such charges may not be over-reaching.

As the article notes, there are mechanisms for at least trying to identify who posts a message if it’s truly defamatory (which requires showing actual damage, not mere cruelty). It’s onerous to bring a libel charge (thanks to the First Amendment), but I’m a bit surprised it hasn’t been attempted — the article, at least, mentions the possibility but not any actual cases where it’s been done. (Though JuicyCampus has turned over IP addresses in other cases where violent crimes seemed to be in the offing.)

This entry was posted on Monday, December 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pm and is filed under Social computing, Surveillance, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.