Doctors buy flagyl without prescription may recommend certain regimens of therapy, according to the person's cheapest zofran transplant eligibility. The doctor will be able to diagnose ALL clindamycin no rx required with tests such as a complete blood count and bone buy generic synthroid marrow aspiration and biopsy. People can experience a milder form buy methotrexate without prescription of mania, known as hypomania, or a more severe form, buy cephalexin without prescription which doctors call acute mania. Usually, other microbes can keep cheap glyburide in canada C. diff under control, but antibiotics can allow the bacterium discount kenalog to grow. That said, scientists have yet to discover the buy ampicillin overnight delivery exact reason to explain why the incidence rate differs among cheap gel online males and females. ALLERGIC REACTIONAs with most drugs, some people order cialis cheap online can have an allergic reaction after taking Esbriet. Medical professionals pharmacy clindamycin typically associate dysphagia with a poorer outlook, but this symptom atenolol sale usually develops or worsens in the later stages of the low cost cialis disease. People should contact a doctor if they experience chronically purchase zoloft no rx discolored or thick nails, or nail separation. It is best for.

Bella English has a good piece in the Globe today about JuicyCampus, the gossip site for all manner of cruel and mean-spirited postings about college students. She’s got the story pretty much right — what JuicyCampus is doing is appalling and, under CDA section 230, legal. An interesting detail she notes is that two states’ Attorneys General are investigating JuicyCampus for not enforcing its own rules against fraud. In the aftermath of the Lori Drew conviction, such charges may not be over-reaching.

As the article notes, there are mechanisms for at least trying to identify who posts a message if it’s truly defamatory (which requires showing actual damage, not mere cruelty). It’s onerous to bring a libel charge (thanks to the First Amendment), but I’m a bit surprised it hasn’t been attempted — the article, at least, mentions the possibility but not any actual cases where it’s been done. (Though JuicyCampus has turned over IP addresses in other cases where violent crimes seemed to be in the offing.)

This entry was posted on Monday, December 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pm and is filed under Social computing, Surveillance, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.