So cheapest kenalog drinking alcohol while taking Aldactone for high blood pressure may order cheapest synthroid no prescription consultation make it hard for you to tell if the drug zyprexa prescription is working. A stroke is a cerebrovascular disease that occurs buy generic prednisolone when oxygen levels to the brain decrease, often resulting from purchase triamterene online a blockage in blood supply or a bleed. To establish cialis no online prescription that the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, we:.We pharmacy viagra do the research so you can find trusted products for purchase cialis without prescription your health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. A bentyl india person can also contact the Sickle Cell Disease Association of lipitor cheapest price America to find further information on testing locations. A person cream sale may not be able to prevent all causes of liver buy cheap viagra internet damage, but they can take steps to reduce their risk cheap triamterene and help prevent cirrhosis from worsening. It is also possible to.

A new law in Georgia requires that registered sexual offenders give their usernames and passwords to the state so that authorities can read their email. The objective is to protect children. Is this reasonable?

Perhaps anyone convicted of a sexual crime can be considered to have sacrificed his right to privacy. But the category is actually fairly squishy. Recall the way UK censors labeled a ’70s LP album cover as “child pornography,” and the fact that until yesterday a woman could be arrested in Massachusetts for indecent exposure or lewd conduct — with a requirement that she register as a sexual offender — if she breast-fed her baby in public.

And if sexual offenders are a real risk of using email to harm children, surely corrupt stockbrokers are a risk of using email to scam customers, etc., etc. Why not make a general rule that if anyone is convicted of a crime, the state gets to monitor all their communications?

Is that the direction we want to go in the name of protecting ourselves?

This entry was posted on Friday, January 2nd, 2009 at 11:39 am and is filed under Privacy, Security, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.