To discount amikacin establish that the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, cheap generic cialis we:.We do the research so you can find trusted products order cheap clonidine online for your health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. order cheap buy sale dosage CBD may have some positive effects on acid reflux, and find sale no prescription required this article will look at the current evidence in more gentamicin eye drops for order detail. CBD can work with a person's cannabinoid receptors, specifically viagra india within their gastrointestinal tract. Pros However, some options are comparatively buy without prescription expensive, while citrus and mint options can exacerbate acid reflux buy cheap drops online symptoms or allergies. However, if an individual uses CBD to discount nasonex counter the effects of acid reflux, they should consider avoiding diflucan online stores CBD featuring mint or citrus fruit flavors. To establish that the.

Because the Internet is like so many different technologies in different ways, it incites a variety of anxieties, and a corresponding variety of responses. Governments’ responses are often poorly thought out over-reactions — poorly thought out and little discussed. The past week’s news gives two astounding examples.

In India, a law innocuously called the Information Technology (Amendment) Bill 2006″ allows the government to intercept any form of electronic communications — email, text messages, or cell phone conversations — in order to investigate “any offence.” This is a post-Mumbai anti-terrorism measure, but like the USA PATRIOT Act, it is utterly lacking in provisions that would restrain the abuse of government authority. It was passed quietly, after little debate. Here is a blogger’s account of the bill (India sleepwalks to total surveillance”), and here is an editorial from the Times of India that backs up the blogger’s horrified reaction (“License to Snoop,” which begins, “Big Brother could¬†really¬†be watching”).

Meanwhile, the Times of London reports:

THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant.

Now it’s not clear what that actually means (are the police going start sending malware via email, just like the bad guys do to steal your account information and passwords?). But the trend is unmistakable: Even in major democracies, law enforcement so fears what people are saying over the Internet that it wants complete access to all of them, with only the cops deciding whether the surveillance and searches are justified.

The price is too high for such measures to be adopted without public discussion. In the U.S., let’s hope for better.

This entry was posted on Monday, January 5th, 2009 at 5:01 pm and is filed under The Internet and the Web, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.