At buy in bangkok the end of the study, the researchers noted improvements among buy ampicillin the participants in several cardiovascular disease risk factors, including reduced azor pharmacy low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. When shopping or eating out, people can atenolol for order choose healthier plant-based meats by looking at the ingredients or order for cheap online nutrition labels. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), tetracycline for order chia and flax seeds contain the following nutritional values. While cheap buy in canada experimental studies found a diet high in flax had associations cheapest colchicine with limited tumor growth and spread, more research is needed. buy discount cialis online Although ground seeds are easier to digest and may provide cheap 60 from canada more nutrients, people can also consume them whole or add them.

IANAL (I am not a lawyer) and I have no idea if Professor Charles Nesson is going to prevail in his defense of Joel Tenenbaum and his counterclaims that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is unconstitutional. But the recording industry sure is taking him seriously. When Nesson asked for a hearing in the case to be webcast, the RIAA reacted with horror — rather oddly, as the judge noted in granting Nesson’s request, given that the RIAA claims that it wants publicity of its anti-piracy campaign. Now the judge has delayed the hearing so the RIAA can appeal to a higher court her ruling about webcasting the proceedings.

Meanwhile, the RIAA sent Nesson a letter (pdf) demanding that he drop a request for a deposition by one of the RIAA’s former lawyers, stating that it would ask the court to sanction him if he didn’t comply. Nesson’s classic reply, quoted verbatim:

our motion stands

we welcome your opposition

And the next day the RIAA went ahead and filed court papers stating that “Defendant‚Äôs Motion has no factual or legal basis whatsoever” and asking Nesson to pay for their costs in opposing it (as apparently the law provides in the case of certain patently gratuitous motions).

There are serious and important issues at stake here, as we discuss in Chapter 6 of Blown to Bits. But on top of that, the lawyers’ duel makes good theatre.

This entry was posted on Friday, January 23rd, 2009 at 8:27 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.