Blown To Bits

Facebook’s Lawyers Screw Up Digital Redaction

Thursday, February 12th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Feverfew pyrantel pamoate contains anti-inflammatory compounds, meaning the plant may have anti-inflammatory actions. buy glyburide without prescription According to the ACS, chemotherapy through an intravenous drip can clindamycin india cause nausea and vomiting much faster. Topical or oral medications buy cheap quinine online may reduce inflammation and flushing and help to reduce bumps purchase cialis without prescription and pimples. However, if your doctor prescribes Lyrica off-label for buy no rx cephalexin your anxiety, take it exactly as they recommend. Depending on order zyprexa lowest dosage cheapest price how long the treatment will last, some people may wish amikacin to prepare snacks and drinks to take into the treatment diclofenac online stores room. If a child shows signs of insecure attachment, a viagra from india person can make an appointment with their child's pediatrician. A viagra malaysia range of different things can cause a nose piercing bump, including.

On pages 73-77 of Blown to Bits, we go through three cases in which editors electronically redacted documents to remove sensitive information, not realizing that the way they were doing the redaction changed only the way the document appeared on the screen. The internal representation of the document still included the redacted text, which a simple cut and paste operation disclosed.

Not the most fascinating part of the book, I’ll bet. In fact, I’ll bet some of you skipped over it fairly quickly.

These were serious mistakes with big consequences. I hadn’t heard any recent reports of similar failures.

But the underlying problem hasn’t gone away. The electronic “document” metaphor is too convincing. It’s easy for a editor to infer that what is happening on the screen is what is really happening to the computer file.

A few days ago, it was disclosed that the value put on Facebook at the time the settlement with ConnectU was a lot less than it might have been, had the value been based on Microsoft’s subsequent purchase of a percentage of Facebook. How do we know? The imputed value (and ConnectU’s settlement) were inadvertently revealed by Facebook’s lawyers. Revealed how? Here is the account offered by SiliconValley.com:

Large portions of that hearing are redacted in a transcript of the June hearing, but The Associated Press was able to read the blacked-out portions by copying from an electronic version of the document and pasting the results into another document.

How embarrassing. Moral: read Chapter 3. And remember it!

Added 2/13:¬†Here is the actual PDF. Go to page 22. At the bottom is some whited out text preceded by the word “REDACTED”. Select the white space on the screen (you can do this with any PDF reader) and copy it, then paste it into your usual wordprocessor. Like magic, the $65 million dollar figure appears!

Comments are closed.