This buy generic prozac involves washing hands with soap, disinfecting surfaces with an antimicrobial buy cheapest augmentin alternative solution, and cleaning clothes in the highest setting. Having OHSS accutane online may increase the risk of preeclampsia or premature delivery, but buy tetracycline lowest price no known risks exist in relation to infant development. Some cheap glyburide pill people may develop a chronic condition known as bladder pain buy colchicine without prescription syndrome or interstitial cystitis. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a cheap diclofenac no rx surgical procedure where a surgeon implants electrodes into certain areas cheap cialis from usa of the brain. As a result, Chagas disease mostly affects diflucan online less developed countries that have high levels of substandard housing. buy viagra side effects work Other modifiable and nonmodifiable factors, including health characteristics and lifestyle, griseofulvin sale may also increase the risk of developing pancreatic cancer. However, order retin-a no prescription Enhertu works by weakening your immune system.* Vaccines work by buy cheap lumigan online exposing your immune system to a certain virus or bacterium. Although.

On pages 73-77 of Blown to Bits, we go through three cases in which editors electronically redacted documents to remove sensitive information, not realizing that the way they were doing the redaction changed only the way the document appeared on the screen. The internal representation of the document still included the redacted text, which a simple cut and paste operation disclosed.

Not the most fascinating part of the book, I’ll bet. In fact, I’ll bet some of you skipped over it fairly quickly.

These were serious mistakes with big consequences. I hadn’t heard any recent reports of similar failures.

But the underlying problem hasn’t gone away. The electronic “document” metaphor is too convincing. It’s easy for a editor to infer that what is happening on the screen is what is really happening to the computer file.

A few days ago, it was disclosed that the value put on Facebook at the time the settlement with ConnectU was a lot less than it might have been, had the value been based on Microsoft’s subsequent purchase of a percentage of Facebook. How do we know? The imputed value (and ConnectU’s settlement) were inadvertently revealed by Facebook’s lawyers. Revealed how? Here is the account offered by SiliconValley.com:

Large portions of that hearing are redacted in a transcript of the June hearing, but The Associated Press was able to read the blacked-out portions by copying from an electronic version of the document and pasting the results into another document.

How embarrassing. Moral: read Chapter 3. And remember it!

Added 2/13:¬†Here is the actual PDF. Go to page 22. At the bottom is some whited out text preceded by the word “REDACTED”. Select the white space on the screen (you can do this with any PDF reader) and copy it, then paste it into your usual wordprocessor. Like magic, the $65 million dollar figure appears!

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 12th, 2009 at 10:50 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous, Secrecy and encryption, Social computing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.