Once synthroid generic mature, these blood cells move from bone marrow into the asacol prescription bloodstream, where they perform important functions that keep the body compare viagra prices alive and healthy. They can help you determine whether the order discount gel benefits you may get from this treatment will outweigh its no rx cialis possible risks. LVEF is a measurement of how much blood order cheapest estrace low cost dosage the left ventricle of the heart pumps out with each buy erythromycin without prescription contraction. Because of this, doctors may recommend a person with buy atenolol online IBS-C and overactive bladder drinks more fluids and eats more cialis fiber. Garbanzo beans are a good source of protein and cheap prozac samples fiber and contain essential minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and buy cheap asacol iron. There is a keto diet guide for beginners available order erythromycin without prescription to help people understand the concept and get started right buy accutane online away. Private health insurers may cover part of the costs cheapest norvasc price of generic sildenafil but may not pay for Viagra. The nexium rx cream contains essential oils and moisturizing ingredients that may provide a.

The abominably misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” seems to be gathering steam for reinstatement. I have no political axe to grind here; I’m an information free-marketeer. Can you imagine any court going along with the proposition that by government regulation, editorial opinions in newspapers have to be politically balanced? Given the First Amendment, it is hard to think of anything more un-American.

The argument goes that the airwaves are different; they are public property and there are only so many to go around. As a national resource, they should be distributed “fairly,” so that a range of views can be heard.

There are so many things wrong with this argument from a purely philosophical point of view that it’s hard to know where to begin. Should truth and falsehood be equally represented, and if not, who is to decide whether someone’s claimed truth is actually false? Do Darwin and Usher get equal time to express their views on the age of the earth?

But the fundamental problem here is that spectrum scarcity, which is the premise for its nationalization and government control, is artificial. Chapter 8 explains the reasons, but my evidence could not be simpler. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of broadcast radio stations coexist around you right now. They are called cell phones. Modern radio technology is much more efficient than that of the 1930s when the present schemes for allocating broadcast licenses were legislated.

The case for the government to dictate content of radio broadcasts is very week philosophically, but without its technological foundation, it collapses completely.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 12th, 2009 at 11:30 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Radio and television, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.