Not diovan online eating animal products can help reduce the demand, potentially decreasing cheapest clomid the number of animals that people breed and kill for order diovan no prescription food. These conditions that affect the vertebrae could have resulted buy generic arcoxia from dragging large rocks over long distances. Although some people buy erythromycin without prescription may experience sexual dysfunction and pain after surgery to repair atrovent a hernia, this is usually temporary. Specifically, researchers have been robaxin online investigating the effectiveness of immunotherapy to prevent ovarian cancer. The accutane for order doctor may also order additional testing, such as CT scans, buy glucophage without prescription a colonoscopy, tissue biopsies, and fecal cultures, to rule out synthroid for sale other colitis causes. Psoriatic arthritisPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic discount viagra without prescription inflammatory disease that affects the joints and areas where ligaments norvasc prescription and tendons attach to bone. Excessive pressure may become dangerous order cipro lowest price dosage if a person is unable to sense it and effectively lumigan sale communicate their comfort level. Samples — including blood — were buy cheap accutane collected from each participant, allowing the researches to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Oncer again, in the name of protecting America’s children from exploitation, Congress is considering a massive increase in data collection about the activities of you, me, and everyone else. Specifically, the SAFETY Act (click for the full text) would require that

A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user.

That means not just your Internet Service Provider at home, but Starbucks. And the beneficiaries would be not just police looking for pedophiles, but the recording industry looking for people who downloaded music in an airport lounge.

As we have said before (here and here, for example), the Internet threats to child safety have been mischaracterized and exaggerated, and spending resources on programs like this draws resources away from places where they are badly needed, helping troubled children from troubled families. Bills like this are transparent attempts to exploit the child safety issue to ramp up government data collection about innocent citizens, data that will be repurposed and abused once it has been collected. It’s the kind of Big-Brother surveillance proposed in the UK, as we discussed last fall.

Stop this madness. There is zero evidence that this is a sensible solution to the problem the bill claims to be aimed at, and it is an unconscionable invasion of our rights to privacy.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Privacy, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.