For where to buy viagra example, your risk may be increased by having a weak buy toradol on internet immune system or having sex with multiple partners without a cheap advair internet condom or other barrier method. This is because there is buy cheap levitra online a risk of transmitting the virus to the infant during cheap cephalexin pregnancy or delivery. This pain can be debilitating and may buy cheap pyrantel pamoate online not respond to typical pain relief strategies such as medication, cipro in bangkok rest, and heat. But it may help a person learn purchase prednisolone online coping skills, regulate emotions, or address the impact of negative canadian zithromax messaging and stigma around the condition. Susan G. Komen also cheap acomplia online lists the biology of the tumor and the treatment received cheap betnovate pill as additional factors that can impact the risk of recurrence. flovent online without a prescription Gently ease them onto the ground, if necessary.Remove their glasses buy clozapine pills if they are wearing any.Remove or loosen tight or restrictive purchase generic nexium best price clothing, particularly any items around the neck or head.Place something generic ventolin under the head to cushion it, such as a folded sweater,.

Oncer again, in the name of protecting America’s children from exploitation, Congress is considering a massive increase in data collection about the activities of you, me, and everyone else. Specifically, the SAFETY Act (click for the full text) would require that

A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user.

That means not just your Internet Service Provider at home, but Starbucks. And the beneficiaries would be not just police looking for pedophiles, but the recording industry looking for people who downloaded music in an airport lounge.

As we have said before (here and here, for example), the Internet threats to child safety have been mischaracterized and exaggerated, and spending resources on programs like this draws resources away from places where they are badly needed, helping troubled children from troubled families. Bills like this are transparent attempts to exploit the child safety issue to ramp up government data collection about innocent citizens, data that will be repurposed and abused once it has been collected. It’s the kind of Big-Brother surveillance proposed in the UK, as we discussed last fall.

Stop this madness. There is zero evidence that this is a sensible solution to the problem the bill claims to be aimed at, and it is an unconscionable invasion of our rights to privacy.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Privacy, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.