There buy viagra lowest price are currently no CBD products approved for use in the diflucan side effects pill treatment of dementia, but some research has shown promising results. buy cheap prednisolone internet These include meal planning, meal replacement shakes and snacks, goal store get generic without viagra prescription tracking, and the ability to generate grocery lists from meals diclofenac prescription and recipes. Using a treadmill for running at home can aldactone for sale be a convenient way for people to maintain and improve clonidine cheap their fitness. A person with this type of asthma typically order dexamethasone does not have other common asthma symptoms, such as wheezing. bentyl online stores However, providing a greens powder is third party tested, the viagra discount product should be safe for consumption. Before giving birth, genetic approved prednisolone pharmacy testing and counseling can also help identify whether a person canada ventolin carries a gene variation and how likely it is to find cheap celebrex pass to children. They may avoid certain activities, turn down buy cipro opportunities, or alter their eating patterns based on their actual or.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.