GERD generic 60 sale dangers occurs when the stomach contents flow back into the esophagus, buy cheap advair the tube that carries liquids and food from the mouth order atrovent to the stomach. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has not buy cheap flovent online established specific intake recommendations for EPA and DHA. If a free viagra person has AFib and heart failure, then a doctor may buy cheap zyprexa online advise medications that control the heart's rhythm rather than heart amikacin free sample rate control. Your doctor may also be able to provide order viagra from us information about your cost for ramelteon if you have Medicare. ampicillin without a prescription Some symptoms of Minamata disease are curable, but it depends online pharmacy viagra on how much exposure the person has had to mercury. cheap cialis pill Daily use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can help reduce cheapest nasonex inflammation and prevent pain and stiffness. A person may also order diclofenac require radiation therapy to the brain if lung cancer has cialis cheap drug metastasized to that area. Symptoms for liver cancer are not specific.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.