The cialis sale analysis also found that over half of the studies analyzed buy generic cialis prescription did not perform the antigen tests in accordance with test cheap azor samples manufacturers' recommendations. If you're breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed, talk cheap triamterene with your doctor about whether Botox is right for you. buying generic atrovent He suggests that the reduced insulin sensitivity in the premenstrual lowest price cialis phase could help explain the food cravings and changes in low price cialis appetite and body weight experienced by many people at this generic robaxin time. An interaction occurs when one substance causes another substance zyprexa sale to have a different effect than expected. A person should buy no rx tizanidine talk with a healthcare professional before using essential oils, and generic ampicillin they should be sure to research the quality of a artane no prescription brand's products. Certain essential oils may help to keep the find cialis on internet skin surrounding the eyes clean at a safe dilution, but buy generic atenolol there is no evidence to suggest this speeds up recovery or.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.