Preeclampsia cheap kenalog can cause serious complications to both the pregnant person and canadian buy their baby when left untreated. The blood sample can show buy celebrex cheapest alternatives india a person's platelet count, while urine samples can show the viagra australia presence of protein in the urine, which could suggest that buy discount augmentin without prescription info the kidneys are not working effectively. A person who has online pharmacy experienced preeclampsia has about four times the risk of developing viagra online cheap chronic high blood pressure and twice the risk of having cheap dexamethasone internet heart disease or a stroke than someone who has not flagyl sale had this condition. If left untreated, preeclampsia can cause serious find discount clindamycin health complications to the pregnant person and their baby, including buy griseofulvin internet organ failure and death. The obese population starts at a buy augmentin online higher baseline risk of death, so even with higher than recommended.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.