Blown To Bits

Apple’s Anti-Competitive Use of Copyright

Saturday, March 14th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
For generic best sale dangers example, it does not cater to people following a vegan buy cheap asacol side effects liquid diet or those with very particular tastes or several food find no rx atenolol allergies. HelloFresh does not offer specific options for people following cafergot without rx vegan or gluten-free diets or those adhering to keto, paleo, estradiol in malaysia or low-sugar diets. HelloFresh is transparent about its pricing and purchase cheap cheap low cost consultation shows customers a breakdown of costs before they sign up. colchicine online How we vet brands and productsMedical News Today only shows generic buy sale dangers you brands and products that we stand behind. Some people order discount bentyl online effects may consider resetting their eating habits if they have eaten free cipro heavy calorie-dense meals for a few days before. The meals nexium for order are plant-based, dairy, gluten, and soy free and contain no buy glucophage no rx genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Those who have celiac disease may buy professional have to check that the food is safe for their condition,.

On page 216 of the book, we joke that DMCA might stand for “Digital Millennium Competition Avoidance” rather than “‚Ķ Copyright Act.” The idea is that if a company puts a digital lock on any interface to its equipment, then the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA makes it illegal for an maker of accessories to reverse-engineer the lock to figure out how to make a compatible accessory. Apple Computer has given us a classic example of this technique.

If you walk into any electronics store or any WalMarts, you’ll find lots of earphones that you can use with your iPod, in case you lose the ones it came with, or they don’t fit your ears, or whatever. The earphones are on the racks with slipcovers and lots of other non-Apple stuff that accessorizes iPods. Of course you can buy Apple earphones, but maybe you’d rather buy the ones that fit better.

Well, Apple wants you to buy Apple earphones. The way the capitalist world is supposed to work, Apple is supposed to achieve that by making better earphones, or by cutting its prices. Everyone else has the same incentives, and the consumer wins from the competition.

Oh, not in the America of the DMCA. Apple has engineered the new iPod Shuffle so that the replacement headphones won’t work unless they have built into them an “authentication chip” the headphone maker can get only from Apple. Now the headphone maker is prohibited by law from trying to figure out what the “authentication chip” does so it can make headphones you can just plug into the Shuffle without, in essence, asking Apple’s permission and paying Apple money. So Apple winds up controlling the headphone market.

A classic case of copyright law being put to a use that has nothing at all to do with the protection of books or music or images — just to kill competition, to the advantage of one company and to the plain disadvantage of the public.

Thanks to Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation for raising a stink.

Comments are closed.