If purchase generic generic alternatives problems uncontrolled, fleas can spread across the body and bite anywhere, purchase glyburide online especially on people with dense areas of hair on their buy cheap acomplia online legs or chest. If the affected person has swollen glands, purchase atenolol online extreme pain around the bite, or excessive redness, they should discount zyprexa speak with a doctor. Fleas can be difficult to destroy, buy cheap cheap so people might want to consult a professional exterminator to buy free (ovral prescription learn more. This sleeping issue typically arises when traveling across acomplia no rx at least three time zones, but it can arise from buy free cheap prescription smaller disruptions. People can also speak with a healthcare professional buy cheap buy online before flying if they have concerns about their health on cheap buy no prescription the trip. Preventive tips can help someone stay safe when cheap lasix in usa traveling, including washing hands regularly, wearing compression socks, and keeping cheap accutane in usa hydrated. Blood clots may cause valvular damage — related to purchase flagyl no rx valves in the leg — resulting in venous insufficiency. These include.

We reported for the first time back in October on the case of RIAA v. Tenenbaum. The Recording Industries have taken one Joel Tenenbaum to task for downloading a few songs while he was a BU student, and Mr. Tenenbaum wants a trial. He is being defended by Prof. Charles Nesson of Harvard Law School. Prof. Nesson has challenged the very constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, on basis that the statutory penalties are so disproportionate to the actual damages that the law functions as a criminal statute even though it is a civil statute. That the DMCA is (for the most part) a civil statute has many consequences — the standard of proof is lower, and the defendant has no right to public defender, for example. The result is that defendants in copyright cases almost never contest; instead they settle up with the RIAA out of court.

There has been some suspense over whether the Obama administration’s Justice Department would enter into this controversy. On the one hand, the new administration prides itself on being the friend of the little guy. On the other hand, both the Vice President and several senior members of the Justice Department have reputations as friends of the copyright industry.

Today we have our answer: the Justice Department has indeed entered the argument, and sides unequivocally with the Recording Industries. The DOJ brief (pdf, 31 pages) urges the judge not to deal with the constitutional question if she can avoid it, and then dismisses every constitutional argument put forward by the defense. According to this summary by Recording Industry vs. the People, the Justice Department memo makes no response to the arguments put forward by the¬†Free Software Foundation in support of Tenenbaum’s case — citing various cases and authorities to the effect that the statutory damages set by the DMCA are unconscionably high.

It’s a disappointment — the DMCA is bad law, as we detail in Chapter 6, and we might have hoped for better from the new administration. But previous Justice Departments had sided with the Recording Industries, so perhaps this should have come as no surprise — even with the enlightened Elena Kagan as the government’s top lawyer.

Slashdot has a good precis, and almost 500 comments as of this writing.

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.