There zithromax sales are various risk factors, which may include conditions, such as find viagra on internet obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. For instance, in the earlier acomplia online stores stages of arrhythmia, an individual may experience a heart palpitation t-ject 60 for order or the sensation of a skipped heartbeat. More scientific research buy viagra online cheap is necessary to understand the effects of cannabis, CBD, and generic erythromycin THC.Learn the difference between CBD and THC here. A person glyburide online should talk with a healthcare professional before using essential oils, cipro online and they should be sure to research the quality of flovent us a brand's products. CBD products, such as CBD capsules, are buy mirapex becoming increasingly popular due to their potential health benefits. Doctors viagra buy drug prescribe sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) for heart failure, which is available as pharmacy cialis an oral tablet. If you're having trouble opening medication bottles, clindamycin gel ask your pharmacist about putting Lyrica in an easy-open container. Talk.

A draft cybersecurity bill empowers the president to commandeer the Internet under vaguely specified circumstances:

The President … may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network …

Now the Internet is inherently hard to control, because of its distributed architecture, and the vast numbers of private and governmental parties, spread across the globe. I wonder what would actually happen if he gave the order. The language of the bill also states that the President

may order the disconnection of any Federal government or United States critical infrastructure information systems or networks in the interest of national security,

which may sound reasonable until you recall how capacious “national security” interests can be — broad enough that allowing the American public to see the draft of an anti-music-piracy trade agreement drafted with the assistance of the RIAA is also considered a national security threat. By that standard, the President could cut off your Internet connection if he though you were a file-sharing risk.

There is, moreover, a category of “Federal government and¬†private sector owned critical infrastructure information¬†systems and networks.” These are not defined in the proposed statute — the President (surprise) gets to say which systems and networks are “critical.” The bill then gives the government complete access to everything about them:

The Secretary of Commerce shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access.

Now I am guessing that the Internet backbone would be critical, don’t you think? Pretty much all traffic flows through the backbone, so it seems this clause may with one stroke of a pen invalidate ALL privacy laws and protections relating to electronic communications.

There is a lot in this bill to like — it calls for important research and creates some emergency-response structures that are likely to be more good than threatening. There is also much to make one suspicious — it leads with appeals to the economic importance of the Internet, and talks about “intellectual property” long before it mentions “banks.” But the worst seems to me in these few lines, where the drafters, our elected representatives, have said, “The government can seize control of it all and can look at everything.” So much for Congress checking the power of the executive to monitor and interfere with the communications of citizens!

This entry was posted on Friday, April 3rd, 2009 at 4:46 pm and is filed under Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.