These tablet levitra may include adult day care, home care, meal delivery, nutritional tetracycline online counseling, and social services. Finally, case-control studies cannot confirm different order cheap clozapine online levels or types of the disease being investigated. When dehydrated, buy ventolin without prescription the body may have difficulty producing synovial fluid and joints order cheapest atarax dose may become more painful. Sustaining this fracture from low-energy trauma buy cialis us is also a well-established predictor of osteoporosis and subsequent osteoporotic gentamicin eye drops online fragility fractures. Untreated RA may also increase the risk of purchase cephalexin online long-term complications, including disability and joint deformity due to increased triamterene for order joint damage and inflammation. Other side effects may be due viagra australia to the concurrent use of CBD alongside alcohol or other viagra buy drug drugs, which can increase the risk of sedation and drowsiness. buy norvasc on line Experts have found problems in the nervous system that supplies cafergot online review the gut, making it more prone to sensitivity. In the buy lasix cheapest alternatives india case of an outbreak, people who live in communities experiencing order cheap cialis online Japanese encephalitis should remove pools of standing water, where mosquitoes can.

Federal sentencing guidelines are being modified to provide that using an Internet “proxy” to commit a crime should be taken as evidence that you are a particularly evil and devious sort of criminal and should get a stiffer sentence.

Proxies are simply machines that sit between your computer and the Internet for the purpose of making you appear to be elsewhere. People in oppressive regimes use proxies such as Tor to surf the Web while hiding their IP addresses. Corporations use proxies so their employees can work from home but have the access privileges that ordinarily come from being on-site. Proxies are used everywhere to enhance the privacy of Internet communications.

And that’s a problem, apparently, according to the folks revising the sentencing guidelines, because of course criminals can use proxies to hide their footprints. How do you handle a technology that can be used for both good and ill? Short of banning it, you can say that IF you use it to commit a crime, the crime is worse than if you didn’t use it. Says¬†John Morris, general counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology, “This is the government saying, ‘If you take normal steps to protect your privacy, we’re going to view you as a more sophisticated criminal.'”

What’s the point? Criminals are unlikely to cooperate by making their criminal acts more traceable so as to reduce their sentences if they get caught. Instead, proxies will get a bad reputation, as things that are risky or anti-social to use. In fact we should be encouraging proxies, and encryption, and other privacy-protecting technologies.

But it is a tricky argument to make, because this clause in the sentencing guidelines is irrelevant to anyone who hasn’t committed a crime — except that it is part of a general push to force all Internet activities more out in the open where the government can watch it. And us.

Here is the regulation itself (PDF, see pages 5-15). Thanks to Slashdot for the pointer.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 at 1:33 pm and is filed under The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.