While generic glucophage Citrucel powder is typically safe — provided a person follows cipro online stores the directions — it can carry some risks and side buy amikacin overnight delivery effects. Gut microbiomes and its effect on health is a norvasc no rx novel and burgeoning arena for research — which needs further advair in bangkok information. The most common type of laser treatment is narrowband cheap cialis in canada UVB light, although other options include using UVA light. Pain order spiriva on internet management contracts are agreements between a doctor and a person viagra cheap drug seeking pain medication that lists the responsibilities of both parties. cheapest generic viagra Temporarily diverting blood from the heart and lungs into the discount xalatan machine enables a surgeon to operate on a nonbeating heart. low cost ventolin In some cases, even after the shingles rash resolves, complications cipro online stores may develop that cause a person to experience fatigue and cheap bentyl pharmacy other symptoms. However, people may be able to temporarily manage compazine no rx required them with changes to their eyeglasses or contact lens prescriptions. The.

The discussions about how the Google Book settlement proposes to handle orphan works have expanded. A small group of which I am a member have formally sought to intervene. So has the Internet Archive. Today the NYT Bits Blog has a brief explanation, and some good commentary.

There have also been three articles that take up the settlement in a more serious way:

Randy Picker, “The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-works Monopoly?” Picker is an anti-trust lawyer. It’s a longish paper (though not by law review standards), but the first few pages provide a good summary.

Pamela Samuelson: “Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Book Settlement.” An excellent, clear, short critique of the settlement. Easy to read for the layperson, highly recommended. This will be Samuelson’s column in the July issue of the Communications of the ACM.

James Grimmelmann, “The Google Book Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books” (pdf, 17 pages). An issues brief, thoughtful and analytical and complete.

I urge anyone interested to read the Samuelson piece in particular.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.