Therefore, find glucophage no prescription required it is important to always read the label and the cheap cialis pill ingredients list to make sure it is suitable. However, traditional atarax medicine practitioners have used hemp and cannabis products for thousands buy discount buy without prescription info of years to manage many health conditions. However, a person cheap atenolol should always speak with a healthcare professional before trying CBD cheap prescription samples products for these purposes. Green tea, for instance, is an discount (ovral without prescription antioxidant, and small studies have shown it may help with buy discount canada numerous health conditions, including cancer, high cholesterol, and cardiovascular disease. buy buy cheap Full-spectrum CBD oil contains all extracts of the cannabis plant, buy generic petcam (metacam) oral suspension such as CBD, terpenes, flavonoids, other cannabinoids, and essential oils. allopurinol They only extract cannabidiol from this plant, which means that buy cheap triamterene online CBD isolate is free from THC and other phytocannabinoids. Several celebrex for order animal studies indicate that CBD may reduce inflammation or prevent buy sales from canada neurological damage, leading to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis..

The discussions about how the Google Book settlement proposes to handle orphan works have expanded. A small group of which I am a member have formally sought to intervene. So has the Internet Archive. Today the NYT Bits Blog has a brief explanation, and some good commentary.

There have also been three articles that take up the settlement in a more serious way:

Randy Picker, “The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-works Monopoly?” Picker is an anti-trust lawyer. It’s a longish paper (though not by law review standards), but the first few pages provide a good summary.

Pamela Samuelson: “Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Book Settlement.” An excellent, clear, short critique of the settlement. Easy to read for the layperson, highly recommended. This will be Samuelson’s column in the July issue of the Communications of the ACM.

James Grimmelmann, “The Google Book Settlement: Ends, Means, and the Future of Books” (pdf, 17 pages). An issues brief, thoughtful and analytical and complete.

I urge anyone interested to read the Samuelson piece in particular.

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.