People viagra australia can experience constipation after the procedure due to increased progesterone discount artane levels, certain medications, stress, or dehydration. It is important to get cheap viagra online effects make sure that everyone in this environment feels as safe buy retin-a from canada and comfortable as possible. A person with PsA and nail order augmentin in canada symptoms may also experience infections and worsening symptoms if their cheapest cialis prices nail technician uses tools to clean underneath the nail. The buy generic tizanidine problems Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also include whole amikacin grains, beans, and legumes as part of its recommended healthy discount diovan eating plan for maintaining a moderate weight. Both systems take order mirapex into account certain markers of disease progression, such as lymph cialis information node enlargement, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Some people with either ASD purchase diflucan overnight delivery or ADHD may not have received a diagnosis during childhood purchase amoxicillin online or have had a misdiagnosis of another disorder with similar order diovan symptoms. Someone could have another underlying eye condition, such as generic vibramycin advanced glaucoma or retinal problems, that could cause sudden vision loss.

Today’s news brings a nice juxtaposition.

A new law in South Korea would require those who run web sites to get and retain identifying information about the people who post on their sites. Google, which has been criticized in the past for complying with the demands of authoritarian regimes for information about its users, took the extreme step of disallowing all YouTube uploads and comments in Korea. Bravo — this will cost Google some market share, and may put pressure on the government. (Or perhaps not. YouTube is not the leading video site in Korea.) The government feels dissed and is saying as much to Google.

But today also reminds us that sometimes people using the Internet really are criminals and we are glad they are leaving electronic fingerprints behind. A series of assaults on women around Boston was solved very quickly because the alleged perpetrator was incautious enough to send an email from his home to one of his victims. Detectives obtained his IP address from the ISP and started to surveil his house. Security videos at the several crime scenes showed him tapping on his Blackberry; that was another good source of electronic forensics. (How many people could have used the same Blackberry from the three locations at the same times as the video camera showed this gentleman keeping busy?)

The two stories are not incompatible. Such records could be kept for a few weeks for police purposes and then discarded so they won’t be used for mischievous purposes later. Societies lose something by keeping data, and also lose something by deleting it. It’s just a question of making the right tradeoffs.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009 at 4:50 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.