Blown To Bits

DOJ Questions the Google Books Settlement

Friday, July 3rd, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Doctors clomid purchase low free price use sedation to help relax a person during the procedure, buy cheapest flovent no prescription ranging from a person having no sedation to general anesthesia. order levitra from us The time it takes for results may depend on the buy clozapine side effects work medical facility, so people should always ask their doctors to cheap cialis online manage expectations. A doctor can offer guidance about the risks buy cheap zithromax online and benefits of having further laser hair removal sessions after cheap viagra from usa experiencing hives in response to the procedure. The service ranges cheap clonidine from email to sharing relevant information and test results to buy synthroid no rx robotic-assisted interventions. There are also risks associated with following unofficial cheap viagra health advice from unaccredited sources, such as blogs, social media, buy prednisolone pills or word of mouth. When diagnosing RLS, doctors need to find discount cialis online listen to an individual's symptom history and rule out other viagra india potential conditions that could be causing them. You should always cheap accutane consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before taking any purchase toradol online medication. People can use services such as AirNow from the Environmental.

The Department of Justice has now confirmed rumors that it was taking an interest in the draft settlement between Google and the Authors and Publishers, now before federal judge Denny Chin (who just sentenced Bernie Madoff to 150 years). Presumably the question for the DOJ is whether the proposed settlement is anti-competitive; Google responds “It‚Äôs important to note that this agreement is non-exclusive and if approved by the court, stands to expand access to millions of books in the U.S.‚Äù Which is true, but may well not be sufficient to avoid anti-trust issues.¬†¬†See the Digital Daily post here, which includes a link to the actual correspondence between the government and Judge Chin. Judge Chin notes that he is still planning to hold a Fairness hearing on October 7, and if the government wants its views known in writing, it has to submit something by September 18.

Comments are closed.