Medications purchase quinine online for indigestion may reduce or neutralize stomach acid or treat advair free sample infections such as H. pylori. People can discuss the suitable buy generic diclofenac cost work dosage of PPIs with a medical professional to help prevent buy generic gentamicin eye drops possible complications. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) esophagitis is when the order compazine stomach's content comes back up — referred to as reflux buy cheap prozac — into the esophagus. A person should also avoid heavy, buy cheap for online usa large meals before bed and remain upright for a few cheap lipitor pill minutes to allow food to digest before reclining. Several procedures griseofulvin online may help to correct GERD and may treat chronic GERD dexamethasone sale if symptoms do not improve with lifestyle and medication changes find acomplia no prescription required or if the person wishes to stop taking medications. Evidence buy canada suggests that lifestyle changes, like losing weight, and taking medications can.

That is thee title of a superb column by Pamela Samuelson explaining some (but only some) of the worries about the proposed settlement of copyright infringement claims against Google for scanning copyrighted works. She explains the perverse incentives to both parties to this litigation. In a word, each realized that they could become literary monopolists if they played their cards right with each other.

That is exactly the reason why the federal judiciary gets involved in settlements that private parties have negotiated with each other in class action cases. There is too much risk that the parties will find a way to divide the pie between themselves in a way that does not serve the public well.

And, of course, the public would gain much from the settlement. Advocates for the disabled are urging the judge to approve it because it would expand access to works that can be mechanically vocalized. And so it would, at a huge cost o competition, openness, privacy, and various other pitfalls.

It may not matter, if the Department of Justice decides the settlement has serious anti-trust implications, as it certainly seems to. (You can read the DOJ’s curt letter to Google at that site, thanks to DocStoc.)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.