Microwaving lipitor without prescription EPS foam that is not microwave-safe can potentially cause the cialis free sample carcinogenic substance styrene to seep into the food. TIKOSYN INTERACTION discount diflucan WITH CANNABIS OR CBDCannabis (often called marijuana) and cannabis products, free cialis such as cannabidiol (CBD), have been specifically reported to interact find discount augmentin online with Tikosyn. While this community displays a similar susceptibility to triamterene approved mental health conditions as the general population, they experience health cheap zithromax internet inequities that affect the way they receive mental healthcare, such compare zithromax prices as the accessibility and quality of treatment. These comparisons revealed purchase cheap flagyl low cost consultation significant alterations in microglial gene expression due to Alzheimer's, with celexa online stores an increase in PU.1's binding to inflammatory gene targets being cheap serevent a notable part of these changes. If a person has cialis tablets hypertension, they should meet with their doctor regularly to monitor buy diflucan online their blood pressure levels and symptoms. People may benefit from buy no rx aldactone talking with a qualified healthcare professional about their hepatitis B immune.

That is thee title of a superb column by Pamela Samuelson explaining some (but only some) of the worries about the proposed settlement of copyright infringement claims against Google for scanning copyrighted works. She explains the perverse incentives to both parties to this litigation. In a word, each realized that they could become literary monopolists if they played their cards right with each other.

That is exactly the reason why the federal judiciary gets involved in settlements that private parties have negotiated with each other in class action cases. There is too much risk that the parties will find a way to divide the pie between themselves in a way that does not serve the public well.

And, of course, the public would gain much from the settlement. Advocates for the disabled are urging the judge to approve it because it would expand access to works that can be mechanically vocalized. And so it would, at a huge cost o competition, openness, privacy, and various other pitfalls.

It may not matter, if the Department of Justice decides the settlement has serious anti-trust implications, as it certainly seems to. (You can read the DOJ’s curt letter to Google at that site, thanks to DocStoc.)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.