Blown To Bits

The FTC Decides to Regulate Bloggers

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
The diclofenac sale absence of warnings or other information for a given drug atarax online does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is order viagra in canada safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific amikacin online stores uses. Support adrenal health, do plenty of walking and add cheap flagyl no rx strength training to the mix, find self-care options that work buy viagra low cost pharmacy for you to keep it in check Start educating yourself purchase robaxin work on what's happening in your body. Although flu is usually canadian serevent a minor illness, people with PsA may be at higher buy cialis risk of complications, especially if they are currently receiving treatment purchase generic flovent prescription delivery that modifies their immune system. According to the American Cancer Society,.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

Comments are closed.