You norvasc without prescription should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before buy cheap estrace online taking any medication. Increasing body confidence may help improve emotional buy spiriva online and social health and overall quality of life. (To learn buy quinine without prescription whether Creon interacts with supplements, herbs, or vitamins, see the purchase zithromax online "Creon and other interactions" section below.) The study examined the cheap mirapex effects of a small unruptured intracranial aneurysm (sUIA) on a order griseofulvin low price drugs person's mental well-being and daily activities. For information about how get cheapest synthroid low price canada effective these drugs were in clinical trials, see the prescribing generic nexium sale information information for Xeljanz and Humira. To find out what the ampicillin online cheap cost of Cyltezo will be for you, talk with your amoxicillin us doctor, pharmacist, or insurance provider. Surgeons use prosthetic components consisting griseofulvin online of metal, plastic, and ceramic to replace the damaged joint. buy generic ampicillin They may shower a person with gifts, compliments, and other viagra overnight positive interactions that make the other person feel loved and cheap cialis no rx appreciated. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two.

In an editorial published on December 13, the Globe takes the risky position of decrying the penalties of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as “draconian” and the law itself as lacking “common sense” in the area of music downloading. Risky because, of course, the Globe and the New York Times depend on the law to protect their own content. Of course they do not, as the music industry does, take teenagers to court for making copies of their copyrighted content. But that hasn’t stopped the stream of vicious comments about the Globe’s hypocrisy.

The editorial is in response to the trial of Joel Tenenbaum and Judge Nancy Gertner’s plaint to Congress to do something about the “travesty” of justice (the Globe’s word). The paper wonders aloud whether Professor Charles Nesson, who represented Tanenbaum, helped his cause by the defense he took — claiming that music file sharing was allowed under “fair use.” That’s a stretch that even the most libertarian thinkers haven’t endorsed.

What’s interesting to me about the editorial is the reactions. Of course one never knows who the commenters are; they could all be music industry lackeys, for all we know. Still, we have here a defense of big business against a powerless individual — some people even compared him to Madoff, since in each case their crimes were committed with a few keystrokes. There is some amplification of power that people see in the control of digital information that makes them lose all sense of perspective and proportion. I don’t think the same people would think $675,000 was a reasonable fine if Tenenbaum had stolen a CD from a store.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 at 10:57 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.