The viagra cheap drug irritation and inflammation in tissues that allergens affect are parts cheap artane from uk of the reaction associated with hay fever, some forms of viagra in australia asthma, hives, and, in its most serious form, anaphylactic shock. diclofenac overnight WHY ARE COSTS DIFFERENT FOR BIOLOGIC DRUGS VS. BIOSIMILAR DRUGS?Biologic t-ject 60 for order drugs can be expensive because of the research needed to purchase serevent online test their safety and effectiveness. Having low blood levels of viagra online sales magnesium may increase the risk of an irregular heart rhythm* order viagra from canada called AFib. When an infant is born intersex, doctors and lowest price for viagra the infant's parents will often decide to "assign" the infant viagra price a sex and raise them according to the gender norms cheap zoloft no prescription associated with that sex. During a physical exam, the doctor cheapest aldactone checks for swelling and pain in the legs and checks advair for sale a person's range of motion. People often need to take buy compazine without prescription a combination of these medications for a long time, usually for.

This gentleman unwisely posted¬†some photos of himself waving a $20 bills as part of a Craigslist ad, and now believes that copyright law, as well as criminal fraud statutes, will come to his aid in encouraging Gawker to take them down. Gawker doesn’t seem to agree.

What’s interesting here is the gentleman’s confusion between public and private spaces, the conceit that the photos he posted on Craigslist were still “his” to control. Theoretically, Craigslist might have an argument with Gawker, since the Craigslist¬†terms of service state, “You ‚Ķ agree not to reproduce, duplicate or copy Content from the Service without the express written¬†consent of craigslist.” As a practical matter, Gawker is right: “Craigslist is a public place.”

Also interesting are the gentleman’s threats of legal action to respond to what might kindly be called a personal misjudgment. What people think might be done about the problems they have created for themselves has changed, not only with the litigiousness of society in general, but with the litigiousness about bits in particular. Before the RIAA and the MPAA started going after teenagers for music downloading, people like this might never even have heard of copyright law, much less have thought (however mistakenly) that it could protect their reputation. Another thing for which the recording industries can be thanked, I suppose.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 at 12:55 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.