“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
DGL serevent online stores does not contain glycyrrhizic acid, so it may cause fewer drug zyprexa online purchase side effects, although research to confirm this is necessary. There order tetracycline are many nutrition apps that work with Apple Health, including purchase cheap gel sale overdose Noom, UP, MyFitnessPal, and Yummly. The Asthma and Allergy Foundation purchase zoloft without prescription of America explains that people who have asthma may find generic estradiol valerate that the flu virus triggers their asthma symptoms. LEARN MORE order cheap zoloft Best for children and teenagers SuperBetter is a game focusing no prescription toradol on increasing resilience and the ability to remain strong, optimistic, compazine online stores and motivated when presented with challenging obstacles in life. People synthroid australia can check the SCDAA website closer to September to find buy accutane cheap out about upcoming Twitter parties for the current year. The article's.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.