“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Based compare cialis prices online on the evidence currently available, it can give a definitive find discount colchicine answer on a particular question about therapy, prevention, causes of buy cheapest cream on line disease, or harm. They could decrease Abilify's effectiveness or increase lasix online stores your risk of side effects from the drug.† Tell your viagra information doctor about all medications you take. Tumors that cause PT zyprexa prescription are normally benign, which means they are abnormal growths in celebrex sale a person's body that do not spread to other parts clomid online of the body and are not cancerous. They may have lumigan overnight to confront some of their own beliefs about food and clomid their bodies in order to model the behavior for children, purchase levitra online which they may find challenging. People may avoid these effects by.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.