“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Technologies, buy cheap lasix online such as social media, are designed to bring people together, buy free cialis best price jelly yet they may have the opposite effect in some cases. cheapest colchicine If you need to treat a vaginal condition, such as pyrantel pamoate without prescription a yeast infection, while using Annovera, you should use a order clonidine from canada water-based cream or oral treatment. Even when it is expected, colchicine no prescription the death of a loved one is never easy to cheapest ampicillin cope with for those who were close to them. The tizanidine without prescription absence of warnings or other information for a given drug cheap lumigan does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is buy estradiol valerate safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific order discount viagra online uses. Your doctor will likely not prescribe Lynparza if you're buy cheap acomplia online pregnant or trying to become pregnant in the near future. Serotonin.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.