Blown To Bits

What Matter Is

Saturday, February 6th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Intraperitoneal buy cialis online without prescription chemotherapy is a cancer treatment where doctors inject chemo drugs diovan buy directly into a person's peritoneal cavity. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs cheap gel pharmacy (DMARDs) can be prescribed for many different autoimmune conditions. This generic estrace is because the timeframe necessary for the fetus to reach purchase levitra online maturity could allow the cancer to progress. Additionally, a person order quinine lowest price dosage with SCD needs to contact a doctor immediately if they where to buy cialis experience pain in any part of the body that does cheap colchicine in uk not improve with home treatment. Doctors may find it challenging buy generic cialis online to distinguish between endometriosis and IBS because they share common cheap cephalexin symptoms. But the sample was small, so this research is mirapex prescription not entirely conclusive about the negative effects of this product. zithromax online This may involve treating any physical health conditions and finding order cialis overnight delivery a mental health professional to help them overcome emotional difficulties estrace vaginal cream online stores and manage mental health conditions. Depression and anxiety are two mental.

“There needs to be some legislative changes to the definition of what matter is,” the head of the Massachusetts District Attorneys said yesterday, after the Supreme Judicial Court read the state laws very closely and agreed with the defense that lewd text messages were not “matter” as defined in state law. It’s a great example of how hard it is to write laws that both stay current as technology changes, and are not so over-broad, in an effort to cover cases no one has yet thought of, that they unintentionally wind up criminalizing innocent activities.

Here is the heart of the statute (MGL Chapter 272, Section 28):

Section 28. Whoever disseminates to a minor any matter harmful to minors, as defined in section thirty-one, knowing it to be harmful to minors, or has in his possession any such matter with the intent to disseminate the same to minors, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years ….

“Matter” is defined elsewhere as “any handwritten or printed material, visual representation, live performance or sound recording including but not limited to, books, magazines, motion picture films, pamphlets, phonographic records, pictures, photographs, figures, statues, plays, dances.” Now that list was drawn up with some care–it obviously includes everything they could think of at the time, which seems to have been several technological generations ago. I wonder if anyone has similarly challenged whether DVD’s constitute “motion picture films”?

In his opinion, the judge noted that the legislature had changed the law a few years ago to lengthen the prison term to five years, but didn’t bother to change the list of media. So, he concluded, computer to computer communications aren’t covered, and the court has to assume the legislature didn’t intend to include them. The omission is easily remedied, but  it’s not up to the court to do that.

So one creep at least dodged a bullet, and the legislature will no doubt change the law going forward. But it’s a great reminder that the law is a statement of rules, not intentions.

And that it gets stale, not just because of technology changes. Until I was browsing the state’s web site, for example, I didn’t know that adultery was still illegal in Massachusetts (MGL Chapter 272, Section 14):

A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not his spouse or an unmarried person who has sexual intercourse with a married person shall be guilty of adultery and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or in jail for not more than two years or by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars.

Fornication (“sexual intercourse between an unmarried male and an unmarried female”) is still illegal too, but less serious (“punished by imprisonment for not more than three months or by a fine of not more than thirty dollars”).

Any criminals out there?

2 Responses to “What Matter Is”

  1. sy Says:

    “New Massachusetts law extends censorship to IM, e-mail, Web” (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/new-massachusetts-law-extends-censorship-to-im-e-mail-web.ars)

  2. Sherlyn Widmaier Says:

    Hey there’s one problem with the site using OPera the menu is weird :/